↓ Skip to main content

Flying at No Mechanical Energy Cost: Disclosing the Secret of Wandering Albatrosses

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
71 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
pinterest
1 Pinner

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flying at No Mechanical Energy Cost: Disclosing the Secret of Wandering Albatrosses
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041449
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gottfried Sachs, Johannes Traugott, Anna P. Nesterova, Giacomo Dell'Omo, Franz Kümmeth, Wolfgang Heidrich, Alexei L. Vyssotski, Francesco Bonadonna

Abstract

Albatrosses do something that no other birds are able to do: fly thousands of kilometres at no mechanical cost. This is possible because they use dynamic soaring, a flight mode that enables them to gain the energy required for flying from wind. Until now, the physical mechanisms of the energy gain in terms of the energy transfer from the wind to the bird were mostly unknown. Here we show that the energy gain is achieved by a dynamic flight manoeuvre consisting of a continually repeated up-down curve with optimal adjustment to the wind. We determined the energy obtained from the wind by analysing the measured trajectories of free flying birds using a new GPS-signal tracking method yielding a high precision. Our results reveal an evolutionary adaptation to an extreme environment, and may support recent biologically inspired research on robotic aircraft that might utilize albatrosses' flight technique for engineless propulsion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
South Africa 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 134 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 22%
Student > Master 25 16%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Professor 7 5%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 29 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 33%
Engineering 31 20%
Environmental Science 11 7%
Physics and Astronomy 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 40 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#382,542
of 25,847,449 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,423
of 225,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,854
of 187,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#62
of 4,369 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,847,449 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,369 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.