The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,604 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Motor neuroprosthesis implanted with neurointerventional surgery improves capacity for activities of daily living tasks in severe paralysis: first in-human experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016862 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas J Oxley, Peter E Yoo, Gil S Rind, Stephen M Ronayne, C M Sarah Lee, Christin Bird, Victoria Hampshire, Rahul P Sharma, Andrew Morokoff, Daryl L Williams, Christopher MacIsaac, Mark E Howard, Lou Irving, Ivan Vrljic, Cameron Williams, Sam E John, Frank Weissenborn, Madeleine Dazenko, Anna H Balabanski, David Friedenberg, Anthony N Burkitt, Yan T Wong, Katharine J Drummond, Patricia Desmond, Douglas Weber, Timothy Denison, Leigh R Hochberg, Susan Mathers, Terence J O'Brien, Clive N May, J Mocco, David B Grayden, Bruce C V Campbell, Peter Mitchell, Nicholas L Opie |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 249 | 16% |
| United States | 59 | 4% |
| Mexico | 6 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| India | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| China | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 30 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1241 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1520 | 95% |
| Scientists | 60 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 291 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 46 | 16% |
| Unknown | 123 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 48 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 33 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 139 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1254. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#11,533
of 26,388,722 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
#1
of 2,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#493
of 445,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
#1
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.