The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rapid metabolite response in leaf blade and petiole as a marker for shade avoidance syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13007-020-00688-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Benny Jian Rong Sng, Gajendra Pratap Singh, Kien Van Vu, Nam-Hai Chua, Rajeev J. Ram, In-Cheol Jang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 16 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 34% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 16 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#406,221
of 24,220,739 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#8
of 1,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,889
of 424,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,220,739 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.