| Title |
Origins and genetic legacy of prehistoric dogs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aba9572 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anders Bergström, Laurent Frantz, Ryan Schmidt, Erik Ersmark, Ophelie Lebrasseur, Linus Girdland-Flink, Audrey T. Lin, Jan Storå, Karl-Göran Sjögren, David Anthony, Ekaterina Antipina, Sarieh Amiri, Guy Bar-Oz, Vladimir I. Bazaliiskii, Jelena Bulatović, Dorcas Brown, Alberto Carmagnini, Tom Davy, Sergey Fedorov, Ivana Fiore, Deirdre Fulton, Mietje Germonpré, James Haile, Evan K. Irving-Pease, Alexandra Jamieson, Luc Janssens, Irina Kirillova, Liora Kolska Horwitz, Julka Kuzmanovic-Cvetković, Yaroslav Kuzmin, Robert J. Losey, Daria Ložnjak Dizdar, Marjan Mashkour, Mario Novak, Vedat Onar, David Orton, Maja Pasarić, Miljana Radivojević, Dragana Rajković, Benjamin Roberts, Hannah Ryan, Mikhail Sablin, Fedor Shidlovskiy, Ivana Stojanović, Antonio Tagliacozzo, Katerina Trantalidou, Inga Ullén, Aritza Villaluenga, Paula Wapnish, Keith Dobney, Anders Götherström, Anna Linderholm, Love Dalén, Ron Pinhasi, Greger Larson, Pontus Skoglund |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,485 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 427 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 167 | 5% |
| Brazil | 107 | 3% |
| Mexico | 92 | 3% |
| Spain | 81 | 2% |
| Canada | 73 | 2% |
| Japan | 67 | 2% |
| France | 61 | 2% |
| India | 59 | 2% |
| Other | 608 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1743 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2623 | 75% |
| Scientists | 737 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 63 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 58 | 2% |
| Unknown | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 447 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 17% |
| Researcher | 72 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 57 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 76 | 17% |
| Unknown | 114 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 116 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 61 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 19 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 77 | 17% |
| Unknown | 141 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2960. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,161
of 24,552,012 outputs
Outputs from Science
#125
of 79,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131
of 426,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#11
of 989 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,552,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 989 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.