↓ Skip to main content

Differences in Neonicotinoid and Metabolite Sorption to Activated Carbon Are Driven by Alterations to the Insecticidal Pharmacophore

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in Neonicotinoid and Metabolite Sorption to Activated Carbon Are Driven by Alterations to the Insecticidal Pharmacophore
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, October 2020
DOI 10.1021/acs.est.0c04187
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle T. Webb, Matthew R. Nagorzanski, Megan M. Powers, David M. Cwiertny, Michelle L. Hladik, Gregory H. LeFevre

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 13 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 14%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 14 48%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,274,830
of 21,546,712 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#6,556
of 17,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,056
of 398,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#120
of 305 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,546,712 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 305 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.