The Acute Physiological Responses to Traditional vs. Practical Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Exercise in Untrained Men and Women

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, September 2020

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 99 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 4 X posts from 3 X users, with an upper bound of 9,895 followers.

The Acute Physiological Responses to Traditional vs. Practical Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Exercise in Untrained Men and Women https://t.co/K1QaiVMzXt https://t.co/sdHuck7vlx

25 Feb 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @FrontPhysiol: New Research: The Acute Physiological Responses to Traditional vs. Practical Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Exercise i…

03 Nov 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

New Research: The Acute Physiological Responses to Traditional vs. Practical Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Exercise in Untrained Men and Women https://t.co/7faXfgxVI1 #Physiology

03 Nov 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

The Acute Physiological Responses to Traditional vs. Practical Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Exercise in Untrained Men and Women. https://t.co/Mxio1HftgS https://t.co/QyFlQ9wmfh

30 Oct 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity.