↓ Skip to main content

Clinical associations of the metabolic syndrome in systemic lupus erythematosus: data from an international inception cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical associations of the metabolic syndrome in systemic lupus erythematosus: data from an international inception cohort
Published in
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, September 2012
DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben Parker, Murray B Urowitz, Dafna D Gladman, Mark Lunt, Sang-Cheol Bae, Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero, Juanita Romero-Diaz, Caroline Gordon, Daniel J Wallace, Ann E Clarke, Sasha Bernatsky, Ellen M Ginzler, David A Isenberg, Anisur Rahman, Joan T Merrill, Graciela S Alarcón, Barri J Fessler, Paul R Fortin, John G Hanly, Michelle Petri, Kristjan Steinsson, Mary-Anne Dooley, Susan Manzi, Munther A Khamashta, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman, Asad A Zoma, Gunnar K Sturfelt, Ola Nived, Cynthia Aranow, Meggan Mackay, Manuel Ramos-Casals, Raymond F van Vollenhoven, Kenneth C Kalunian, Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza, Sam Lim, Diane L Kamen, Christine A Peschken, Murat Inanc, Ian N Bruce

Abstract

The metabolic syndrome (MetS) may contribute to increased cardiovascular risk in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We aimed to examine the association of demographic factors, lupus phenotype and therapy exposure with the presence of MetS.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 2%
Mexico 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 76 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Unspecified 11 13%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 28 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 71%
Unspecified 13 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 5 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,452,700
of 12,361,872 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#3,622
of 4,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,020
of 126,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#44
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,361,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.