RT @LGradaigh: A frequent flyer levy makes perfect sense. "The percentile of the most frequent fliers – at most 1% of the world population…
A frequent flyer levy makes perfect sense. "The percentile of the most frequent fliers – at most 1% of the world population - likely accounts for more than half of the total emissions from passenger air travel". https://t.co/gO7dDpkXB3).
@JKSteinberger @CarbonBrief @scientificamer (I'm not a fan of the comparison of internet-related GHG with aviation, where ~half of emissions come from ~1% of frequent fliers https://t.co/CuqxMLuSXU and flying is more discretionary and carbon-intensive vs.
@sjowall69 @Terre_a_Tom @timparrique Dernier article Stepahn Gossling et Andreas Humpe Octobre 2020 Le plus complet a ce jour 11% de la population mondiale (845 Mn) prend l'avion chaque année au moins une fois. Soit autour de 4.3 Milliards de Vols et 850
RT @giulio_mattioli: ...and since we're talking about air travel, inequalities and injustice, I would be remiss not to mention this study…
@dale_wen @patrick_s_smart And this for the broader context https://t.co/llItoVHSVE
RT @mczepkiewicz: Air travel is the most 'elite' energy use of all. It's carbon-intensive and a luxury. Only 4% of the global population fl…
RT @mczepkiewicz: Air travel is the most 'elite' energy use of all. It's carbon-intensive and a luxury. Only 4% of the global population fl…
RT @mczepkiewicz: Air travel is the most 'elite' energy use of all. It's carbon-intensive and a luxury. Only 4% of the global population fl…
Air travel is the most 'elite' energy use of all. It's carbon-intensive and a luxury. Only 4% of the global population flew internationally in 2018, and the top 1% of fliers contributed 50% of emissions from aviation in that year (by @StefanGossling) 17/ h
The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation: Implications fo... https://t.co/lA3N6sAom5
@Wuestenmuffin Wichtiger Kontext für diese Fragestellung ist die Tatsache, dass 90% der Weltbevölkerung diesen Verzicht bereits vorleben. Lustigerweise sind es diesselben 90% die am stärksten von den katastrophalen Folgen unseres Konsumverhaltens betroff
@steviedubyu @crisortunity @rutherdan @The_AEF Gössling & Humpe (2020) is definitely the best source (https://t.co/gVizfGkB7C) but they only give the statistic per year, not per lifetime, as far as I'm aware.
RT @andrexnoel: 5. Chaque année, moins de 5% de la population mondiale fait des voyages internationaux en avion. Cette activité de luxe se…
5. Chaque année, moins de 5% de la population mondiale fait des voyages internationaux en avion. Cette activité de luxe se fait au détriment du climat, et en bout de ligne de la majorité de la population mondiale. https://t.co/LpaWnuyCVR
@steviedubyu @keithalexander @crisortunity @rutherdan @The_AEF This paper from @StefanGossling is the closest I've seen academically but again it's the yearly values https://t.co/yxXn1zXTcn Boeing CEO reckoned it was 80%, they may have their own data ht
#TellTheTruth It is not the 99% who are destroying #OurPlanet, #OurHome. It is the greed blinded few who put profits & dividends above all else, including #AllOfLifeOnEarth, forget that they are not separate from #Nature & that when all of #LifeOn
@PopnMatters @LoveDaisyPetals @Gapminder @money_rebellion @StopMoneyPipe @StopFundingHate @ExtinctionR @Fridays4future @Strike4Youth @oxfamgb @dsa_lsc Only 2% to 4% of global population flew internationally in 2018. 1% of the world's population emits 50% o
@kielkontrovers Im Text verlinkte Quelle ergibt dazu: Together, commercial, private and military flight would thus have emitted 978 Mt CO2 in 2017 (IEA, 2019a), of which, in comparison to IATA (2018) data, 87.8% would fall on commercial aviation https://t
New Tumblr post: "@ambodenbleiben: 3/3 Gute Quellen zu Militär, Klima und Flugverkehr: ▶️ https://t.co/E3aClyYwEU ▶️ https://t.co/5s8qYIaHhr ▶️ https://t.co/pm3WRrIcxv" https://t.co/aiZYUO5PZr IFTTT, Twitter
@giulio_mattioli + 50% of aviation emission are caused by 1% of global population and 89% of global population doesn't fly at all https://t.co/ht4IKZoQtk
@SR_PulluP @redouad @BonPote @JKSteinberger "Exclusivity" = "1% of world population emits 50% of CO2 from commercial aviation" https://t.co/3SpHOAirDA
Adicional a esto, su contribución al calentamiento es 225.000 veces superior al de la población con menos ingresos https://t.co/e5tSt2fewB
RT @giulio_mattioli: The comparison he makes between air travel being 2% of emissions and digital services for 4% is also pretty misleading…
RT @giulio_mattioli: The comparison he makes between air travel being 2% of emissions and digital services for 4% is also pretty misleading…
RT @giulio_mattioli: The comparison he makes between air travel being 2% of emissions and digital services for 4% is also pretty misleading…
The comparison he makes between air travel being 2% of emissions and digital services for 4% is also pretty misleading. Only ca. 10% of the world population flies https://t.co/3SpHOAirDA while there is an estimated 4 billion people using social media wor
RT @Green_Sky_Think: 1% of the global population are responsible for 50% of aviation emissions! https://t.co/8WgIMTR0nZ More info on the e…
RT @Green_Sky_Think: 1% of the global population are responsible for 50% of aviation emissions! https://t.co/8WgIMTR0nZ More info on the e…
RT @Green_Sky_Think: 1% of the global population are responsible for 50% of aviation emissions! https://t.co/8WgIMTR0nZ More info on the e…
RT @Green_Sky_Think: 1% of the global population are responsible for 50% of aviation emissions! https://t.co/8WgIMTR0nZ More info on the e…
RT @Green_Sky_Think: 1% of the global population are responsible for 50% of aviation emissions! https://t.co/8WgIMTR0nZ More info on the e…
RT @Green_Sky_Think: 1% of the global population are responsible for 50% of aviation emissions! https://t.co/8WgIMTR0nZ More info on the e…
RT @Green_Sky_Think: 1% of the global population are responsible for 50% of aviation emissions! https://t.co/8WgIMTR0nZ More info on the e…
RT @Green_Sky_Think: 1% of the global population are responsible for 50% of aviation emissions! https://t.co/8WgIMTR0nZ More info on the e…
RT @Green_Sky_Think: 1% of the global population are responsible for 50% of aviation emissions! https://t.co/8WgIMTR0nZ More info on the e…
RT @Green_Sky_Think: 1% of the global population are responsible for 50% of aviation emissions! https://t.co/8WgIMTR0nZ More info on the e…
1% of the global population are responsible for 50% of aviation emissions! https://t.co/8WgIMTR0nZ More info on the elite status of flying and aviation emissions from @_wearepossible can be found here: https://t.co/7xclfY0J28 https://t.co/ciGnoXOBPC
@Frank59749516 @watch_union Zu den 30-50% kommt auch diese Studie: https://t.co/m6sgVM7a7Y "Surveys suggest that among commercial air travelers, the most frequent 10% of fliers may account for 30–50% of all flights taken."
Very interesting paper here on the global scale, distribution and growth of aviation. So Important to think through the who, where, why of flying
In Anlehnung an @StefanGossling: https://t.co/ZnDY6yBWBd Mit Daten von "Mobilität in Tabellen"
De toute urgence svp ! Pour rappel : * Jets privés = 35% des émissions de l'aviation en France * 50% des émissions de l'aviation mondiale causées par 1% de la population ==> les riches et super-riches peuvent payer une taxe sur le kérosène. Source :
RT @WilliamJames108: Only ~2-4% of the global population travelled internationally in 2018. 1% of the worlds population emitted ~50% of CO2…
RT @ShanuMathew93: "Results suggest that the share of the world’s population travelling by air in 2018 was 11%, with at most 4% taking inte…
Stephen Gossling: air transport (global, regional, national, individual scales) @sciencedirect •2% to 4% of global population flew internationally in 2018 • 1% of world population emits 50% of CO2 from commercial aviation •private aviation 7,500 t CO2
RT @ShanuMathew93: "Results suggest that the share of the world’s population travelling by air in 2018 was 11%, with at most 4% taking inte…
"Results suggest that the share of the world’s population travelling by air in 2018 was 11%, with at most 4% taking international flights... the most frequent fliers – 1% of the world population - likely accounts for MORE THAN HALF of the total emissions"
@M_Hundhausen Bitte nicht das Narrativ des Mallorca-Urlaubers weiter bedienen! Beim Luftverkehr geht’s um eine kleine Elite, die den Großteil aller Flüge ausmacht. Das sind Menschen mit teils über 100 (Dienst)Flügen pro Jahr, nicht der Mallorca-Touri.
RT @herpsonc: Rappelons que prendre l'✈️ est un "marqueur de classe" en soit. ~ 4% de la population mondiale prend l'avion chaque année. ~…
RT @herpsonc: Rappelons que prendre l'✈️ est un "marqueur de classe" en soit. ~ 4% de la population mondiale prend l'avion chaque année. ~…
RT @herpsonc: Rappelons que prendre l'✈️ est un "marqueur de classe" en soit. ~ 4% de la population mondiale prend l'avion chaque année. ~…
RT @herpsonc: Rappelons que prendre l'✈️ est un "marqueur de classe" en soit. ~ 4% de la population mondiale prend l'avion chaque année. ~…
Rapport principal jets privés - https://t.co/q1tA0C9Jsv Sources complémentaires - https://t.co/mmnBP2owB6 - https://t.co/0zvWO92BYh NvPM : - https://t.co/RaLCFpbZqF - https://t.co/kyQJp22e1J
Rappelons que prendre l'✈️ est un "marqueur de classe" en soit. ~ 4% de la population mondiale prend l'avion chaque année. ~ 𝟏% 𝐝𝐞 𝐥𝐚 𝐩𝐨𝐩𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐞 représente à elle seule 𝟓𝟎% (!) 𝐝𝐞𝐬 𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐂𝐎𝟐 de l’aérien. https://t.co/0zvWO92BYh
References: 1/2 https://t.co/slz7B6bRgO
The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation: Implications fo... https://t.co/EOa0szN3So
#businesstraveller The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation: Implications for climate change - ScienceDirect https://t.co/cCeaxE1r43
@riffklima @milankloewer Achtung: Diese 2,5 % beziehen sich auf die globale Ebene. Wenn man die aktuell extrem ungleiche Verteilung von Flügen mit einbezieht (und sie hoffentlich reduzieren möchte), bedeutet das für Länder wie Deutschland eine viel deutlic
In addition, air traffic is enormously unevenly distributed. A few frequent flyers cause the majority of emissions: In 2018, 50% of aviation emissions were caused by 1% of the world's population, as research by @StefanGossling an Andreas Humpe shows. https
Private jets should be banned ✈️ Emissions from private air travel can amount to 7,500t CO2 per year (per individual) #COP26 https://t.co/qA4M3llhJz
We all hope that there will be breakthrough innovation in aviation in about a decade, but that might mean more than 10GtCO2 emitted until then. Hence, another ugly truth, we need our emissions for other things more. Is this a problem and for whom? https:
4% of jet emissions are from private aircraft... but no fun letting facts get in the way... https://t.co/i9ZQWdesa1!
@Jo_Le_Goeland Quand au progrès social, il ne doit pas se faire au détriment de ceux qui ne prennent pas l'avion, ce qui représente 90% des humains et 20% des français, contre 1% de la pop. mondiale responsable de 50% des GES du transport aérien... https:/
@NoerregaardRas @SFpolitik @regeringDK @Enhedslisten 1% af verdens befolkning står for 50% af udledningerne fra luftfart: https://t.co/Z3vGYfPkWo. Er med på, at det ikke kan overføres 1:1 til rige DK. Men i England stod 10% af befolkningen for over 50% af
RT @CharlieJGardner: Global aviation costs $100 billion/year in climate damages, a huge subsidy from the global poor to the wealthy pollute…
@GII_1985 @math_caill @raphaelsurcouf Il s'agit de l'aviation commerciale. La source : https://t.co/SHKhEZyEP2
@joeloyo @_wearepossible And this paper also looks at it: https://t.co/grsY5hh2lZ
RT @CharlieJGardner: Global aviation costs $100 billion/year in climate damages, a huge subsidy from the global poor to the wealthy pollute…
RT @CharlieJGardner: Global aviation costs $100 billion/year in climate damages, a huge subsidy from the global poor to the wealthy pollute…
The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation: Implications for climate change... https://t.co/LhbpcEyWbs
RT @CharlieJGardner: Global aviation costs $100 billion/year in climate damages, a huge subsidy from the global poor to the wealthy pollute…
RT @CharlieJGardner: Global aviation costs $100 billion/year in climate damages, a huge subsidy from the global poor to the wealthy pollute…
RT @CharlieJGardner: Global aviation costs $100 billion/year in climate damages, a huge subsidy from the global poor to the wealthy pollute…
RT @CharlieJGardner: Global aviation costs $100 billion/year in climate damages, a huge subsidy from the global poor to the wealthy pollute…
RT @CharlieJGardner: Global aviation costs $100 billion/year in climate damages, a huge subsidy from the global poor to the wealthy pollute…
Global aviation costs $100 billion/year in climate damages, a huge subsidy from the global poor to the wealthy polluter elite If only that subsidy was paid in cash, rather than failed crops, storm damages, mass suffering and death https://t.co/GVPCrfvwrD
RT @Green_Sky_Think: 4. Flying is a highly unequal activity as only 2% to 4% of the global population flew internationally in 2018, and onl…
Særligt flytransport illustrerer den store ulighed i CO2-regnskabet. Forskning viser, at den rigeste ene procent er ansvarlig for godt 50 procent af verdens udledninger fra kommercielle flyvninger. https://t.co/OBCAcHfci7
@jodirmurphy @XRebellionUK It’s passenger air travel only, I think. It’s from this study https://t.co/kYpn9tYn6Y
@Privatecarfree @SarahWa72623615 Spot on! It's 3-4% that fly internationally in a given year and only 20% of people have actually ever been in an aircraft. Stats are here: https://t.co/8WgIMTR0nZ Sarah's graph is for emissions generally across sectors.
RT @colavitos_ghost: @XRebellionUK Can you cite the study about private jets' contribution to global aviation emissions? This study puts it…
@XRebellionUK Can you cite the study about private jets' contribution to global aviation emissions? This study puts it at 4% https://t.co/3BybxT52g9!
RT @Green_Sky_Think: 4. Flying is a highly unequal activity as only 2% to 4% of the global population flew internationally in 2018, and onl…
@apcbapcb This seems to be the source? https://t.co/dUwGW5S8av But the number is completely different in this?
RT @Green_Sky_Think: 4. Flying is a highly unequal activity as only 2% to 4% of the global population flew internationally in 2018, and onl…
4. Flying is a highly unequal activity as only 2% to 4% of the global population flew internationally in 2018, and only 1% of world population emitted 50% of CO2 from commercial aviation: https://t.co/8WgIMTR0nZ See also this report from @_wearepossible:
@Leigh_Phillips @Murali_Thoppil It's not my opinion: https://t.co/RlkkQ3j60H https://t.co/BbFUBoKDIa https://t.co/fgxB1pknPg https://t.co/PGoYTuTUBG I'm all for increasing renewable energy generation, I've already explained to you: we're constrained by
RT @GCgatwick: Only 2% to 4% of the global population flew internationally in 2018. And 1% of the population emits 50% of the CO2 from comm…
RT @josiahneufeld: Hopefully never. The amount of non-essential flying we do in the Global North is obscene from a climate justice perspect…
RT @GCgatwick: Only 2% to 4% of the global population flew internationally in 2018. And 1% of the population emits 50% of the CO2 from comm…
RT @GCgatwick: Only 2% to 4% of the global population flew internationally in 2018. And 1% of the population emits 50% of the CO2 from comm…
Only 2% to 4% of the global population flew internationally in 2018. And 1% of the population emits 50% of the CO2 from commercial aviation.
RT @StayGroundedNet: And the science is clear!! https://t.co/pOSV3f8tuN @StefanGossling
@jdl288 @MacLesggy @lemondefr Donc, pas d'outil de mesure de l'impact environnemental de l'industrie du tourisme, ni de réflexion sur son rôle en matière de soutenabilité? Cet article peut vous intéresser, https://t.co/ueykwXdSgx
Hopefully never. The amount of non-essential flying we do in the Global North is obscene from a climate justice perspective. Canada doesn't count int'l aviation in its CO2 budget. At least 80 per cent of people on the planet have never boarded an airplane.