↓ Skip to main content

Public spending on orphan medicines: a review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Public spending on orphan medicines: a review of the literature
Published in
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40545-020-00260-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margit Gombocz, Sabine Vogler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 50%
Student > Postgraduate 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2020.
All research outputs
#12,447,576
of 16,325,031 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#240
of 257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,823
of 320,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#59
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,325,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.