↓ Skip to main content

The stability of androgynous names: Dynamics of gendered naming practices in the United States 1880–2016

Overview of attention for article published in Poetics, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The stability of androgynous names: Dynamics of gendered naming practices in the United States 1880–2016
Published in
Poetics, April 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101501
Authors

Charles Seguin, Chris Julien, Yongjun Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 50%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 2 50%
Psychology 1 25%
Social Sciences 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,464,882
of 19,846,165 outputs
Outputs from Poetics
#76
of 442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,621
of 393,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Poetics
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,846,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.