↓ Skip to main content

The Peculiarities of Large Intron Splicing in Animals

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Peculiarities of Large Intron Splicing in Animals
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007853
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel Shepard, Mark McCreary, Alexei Fedorov

Abstract

In mammals a considerable 92% of genes contain introns, with hundreds and hundreds of these introns reaching the incredible size of over 50,000 nucleotides. These "large introns" must be spliced out of the pre-mRNA in a timely fashion, which involves bringing together distant 5' and 3' acceptor and donor splice sites. In invertebrates, especially Drosophila, it has been shown that larger introns can be spliced efficiently through a process known as recursive splicing-a consecutive splicing from the 5'-end at a series of combined donor-acceptor splice sites called RP-sites. Using a computational analysis of the genomic sequences, we show that vertebrates lack the proper enrichment of RP-sites in their large introns, and, therefore, require some other method to aid splicing. We analyzed over 15,000 non-redundant, large introns from six mammals, 1,600 from chicken and zebrafish, and 560 non-redundant large introns from five invertebrates. Our bioinformatic investigation demonstrates that, unlike the studied invertebrates, the studied vertebrate genomes contain consistently abundant amounts of direct and complementary strand interspersed repetitive elements (mainly SINEs and LINEs) that may form stems with each other in large introns. This examination showed that predicted stems are indeed abundant and stable in the large introns of mammals. We hypothesize that such stems with long loops within large introns allow intron splice sites to find each other more quickly by folding the intronic RNA upon itself at smaller intervals and, thus, reducing the distance between donor and acceptor sites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Brazil 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 88 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 29%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 6 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 24%
Computer Science 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 9 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,151,132
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#115,596
of 193,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,339
of 78,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#444
of 539 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 539 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.