You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Pilot Study of Essential Drug Quality in Two Major Cities in India
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2009
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0006003 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roger Bate, Richard Tren, Lorraine Mooney, Kimberly Hess, Barun Mitra, Bibek Debroy, Amir Attaran |
Abstract |
India is an increasingly influential player in the global pharmaceutical market. Key parts of the drug regulatory system are controlled by the states, each of which applies its own standards for enforcement, not always consistent with others. A pilot study was conducted in two major cities in India, Delhi and Chennai, to explore the question/hypothesis/extent of substandard and counterfeit drugs available in the market and to discuss how the Indian state and federal governments could improve drug regulation and more importantly regulatory enforcement to combat these drugs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 33% |
Germany | 1 | 33% |
India | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 103 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 24% |
Researcher | 17 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
Lecturer | 8 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 15% |
Unknown | 18 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 16% |
Unknown | 25 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,304,232
of 24,620,113 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#16,683
of 212,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,747
of 116,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#52
of 525 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,620,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 525 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.