↓ Skip to main content

Partaking in the global movement for occupational mental health: what challenges and ways forward for sub-Sahara Africa?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Partaking in the global movement for occupational mental health: what challenges and ways forward for sub-Sahara Africa?
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1752-4458-6-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olayinka Atilola

Abstract

There is an ongoing global movement for the entrenchment of occupational mental health as an integral part of occupational health and safety schemes. Aside from being a fundamental human right issue, this move has been demonstrated to be of cost-benefit in terms of workplace productivity and general economic growth. Despite being among the regions most prone to the human and economic repercussions of work-related mental health problems by reason of her socio-economic circumstance; sub-Sahara Africa is yet to fully plug into this movement. With a view to make recommendations on the ways forward for sub-Sahara Africa, this paper examines the current state of and the barriers to effective occupational mental health policy and practice in the region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Ghana 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 20%
Student > Postgraduate 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Psychology 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2012.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#546
of 759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,190
of 187,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.