↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Diabetology, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
525 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
407 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Cardiovascular Diabetology, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/1475-2840-4-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeanette Johansen, Alex K Harris, David J Rychly, Adviye Ergul

Abstract

Cardiovascular complications, characterized by endothelial dysfunction and accelerated atherosclerosis, are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality associated with diabetes. There is growing evidence that excess generation of highly reactive free radicals, largely due to hyperglycemia, causes oxidative stress, which further exacerbates the development and progression of diabetes and its complications. Overproduction and/or insufficient removal of these free radicals result in vascular dysfunction, damage to cellular proteins, membrane lipids and nucleic acids. Despite overwhelming evidence on the damaging consequences of oxidative stress and its role in experimental diabetes, large scale clinical trials with classic antioxidants failed to demonstrate any benefit for diabetic patients. As our understanding of the mechanisms of free radical generation evolves, it is becoming clear that rather than merely scavenging reactive radicals, a more comprehensive approach aimed at preventing the generation of these reactive species as well as scavenging may prove more beneficial. Therefore, new strategies with classic as well as new antioxidants should be implemented in the treatment of diabetes.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 392 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 19%
Student > Master 77 19%
Researcher 40 10%
Student > Bachelor 32 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Other 108 27%
Unknown 46 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 119 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 76 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 9%
Chemistry 27 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 26 6%
Other 60 15%
Unknown 61 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2012.
All research outputs
#11,100,609
of 12,483,518 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#608
of 737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,864
of 125,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,483,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.