You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of high-dose intravenous vitamin C on inflammation in cancer patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-10-189 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nina Mikirova, Joseph Casciari, Andrea Rogers, Paul Taylor |
Abstract |
An inflammatory component is present in the microenvironment of most neoplastic tissues. Inflammation and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) are associated with poor prognosis and decreased survival in many types of cancer.Vitamin C has been suggested as having both a preventative and therapeutic role in a number of pathologies when administered at much higher-than-recommended dietary allowance levels.Since in vitro studies demonstrated inhibition of pro-inflammatory pathways by millimolar concentrations of vitamin C, we decided to analyze the effects of high dose IVC therapy in suppression of inflammation in cancer patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 17 | 27% |
Spain | 7 | 11% |
Canada | 7 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Belize | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 48 | 76% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 19% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | 1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
India | 2 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Lebanon | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 211 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 40 | 18% |
Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
Researcher | 28 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 10% |
Other | 16 | 7% |
Other | 46 | 21% |
Unknown | 41 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 40% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
Psychology | 4 | 2% |
Other | 27 | 12% |
Unknown | 46 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#617,175
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#129
of 4,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,128
of 191,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.