↓ Skip to main content

Effect of high-dose intravenous vitamin C on inflammation in cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
63 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
38 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of high-dose intravenous vitamin C on inflammation in cancer patients
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-10-189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nina Mikirova, Joseph Casciari, Andrea Rogers, Paul Taylor

Abstract

An inflammatory component is present in the microenvironment of most neoplastic tissues. Inflammation and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) are associated with poor prognosis and decreased survival in many types of cancer.Vitamin C has been suggested as having both a preventative and therapeutic role in a number of pathologies when administered at much higher-than-recommended dietary allowance levels.Since in vitro studies demonstrated inhibition of pro-inflammatory pathways by millimolar concentrations of vitamin C, we decided to analyze the effects of high dose IVC therapy in suppression of inflammation in cancer patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
Unknown 211 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 18%
Student > Master 29 13%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Other 16 7%
Other 46 21%
Unknown 41 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 46 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#617,175
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#129
of 4,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,128
of 191,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.