↓ Skip to main content

Intravenous versus intramuscular prophylactic oxytocin for reducing blood loss in the third stage of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
59 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intravenous versus intramuscular prophylactic oxytocin for reducing blood loss in the third stage of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009332.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olufemi T Oladapo, Babasola O Okusanya, Edgardo Abalos, Ioannis D Gallos, Argyro Papadopoulou

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 260 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 8%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Researcher 18 7%
Other 9 3%
Unspecified 9 3%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 154 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 13%
Unspecified 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 162 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#950,141
of 26,536,755 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,714
of 13,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,265
of 440,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,536,755 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.