↓ Skip to main content

Music and Early Language Acquisition

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
63 X users
facebook
15 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
602 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Music and Early Language Acquisition
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00327
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony Brandt, Molly Gebrian, L. Robert Slevc

Abstract

Language is typically viewed as fundamental to human intelligence. Music, while recognized as a human universal, is often treated as an ancillary ability - one dependent on or derivative of language. In contrast, we argue that it is more productive from a developmental perspective to describe spoken language as a special type of music. A review of existing studies presents a compelling case that musical hearing and ability is essential to language acquisition. In addition, we challenge the prevailing view that music cognition matures more slowly than language and is more difficult; instead, we argue that music learning matches the speed and effort of language acquisition. We conclude that music merits a central place in our understanding of human development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 602 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
France 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Other 14 2%
Unknown 562 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 103 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 14%
Student > Bachelor 84 14%
Researcher 53 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 5%
Other 127 21%
Unknown 120 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 145 24%
Linguistics 79 13%
Arts and Humanities 75 12%
Social Sciences 52 9%
Neuroscience 39 6%
Other 75 12%
Unknown 137 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2023.
All research outputs
#296,639
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#621
of 34,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,445
of 252,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#12
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.