↓ Skip to main content

Systemic delays in the initiation of antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy do not improve outcomes of HIV-positive mothers: a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systemic delays in the initiation of antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy do not improve outcomes of HIV-positive mothers: a cohort study
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-12-94
Pubmed ID
Authors

Landon Myer, Rose Zulliger, Linda-Gail Bekker, Elaine Abrams

Abstract

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation in eligible HIV-infected pregnant women is an important intervention to promote maternal and child health. Increasing the duration of ART received before delivery plays a major role in preventing vertical HIV transmission, but pregnant women across Africa experience significant delays in starting ART, partly due the perceived need to deliver ART counseling and patient education before ART initiation. We examined whether delaying ART to provide pre-ART counseling was associated with improved outcomes among HIV-infected women in Cape Town, South Africa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 2%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 101 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 28%
Researcher 26 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 47%
Social Sciences 12 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 15 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2012.
All research outputs
#12,860,342
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,320
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,428
of 168,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#27
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.