↓ Skip to main content

Gene Duplicability-Connectivity-Complexity across Organisms and a Neutral Evolutionary Explanation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gene Duplicability-Connectivity-Complexity across Organisms and a Neutral Evolutionary Explanation
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0044491
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yun Zhu, Peng Du, Luay Nakhleh

Abstract

Gene duplication has long been acknowledged by biologists as a major evolutionary force shaping genomic architectures and characteristics across the Tree of Life. Major research has been conducting on elucidating the fate of duplicated genes in a variety of organisms, as well as factors that affect a gene's duplicability--that is, the tendency of certain genes to retain more duplicates than others. In particular, two studies have looked at the correlation between gene duplicability and its degree in a protein-protein interaction network in yeast, mouse, and human, and another has looked at the correlation between gene duplicability and its complexity (length, number of domains, etc.) in yeast. In this paper, we extend these studies to six species, and two trends emerge. There is an increase in the duplicability-connectivity correlation that agrees with the increase in the genome size as well as the phylogenetic relationship of the species. Further, the duplicability-complexity correlation seems to be constant across the species. We argue that the observed correlations can be explained by neutral evolutionary forces acting on the genomic regions containing the genes. For the duplicability-connectivity correlation, we show through simulations that an increasing trend can be obtained by adjusting parameters to approximate genomic characteristics of the respective species. Our results call for more research into factors, adaptive and non-adaptive alike, that determine a gene's duplicability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Saudi Arabia 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
Unknown 30 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 32%
Researcher 8 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 16%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 21%
Engineering 3 8%
Computer Science 2 5%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2012.
All research outputs
#22,948,359
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#202,170
of 223,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,811
of 187,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,880
of 4,271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.