↓ Skip to main content

Intrinsic Brain Connectivity Related to Age in Young and Middle Aged Adults

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intrinsic Brain Connectivity Related to Age in Young and Middle Aged Adults
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0044067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Hampson, Fuyuze Tokoglu, Xilin Shen, Dustin Scheinost, Xenophon Papademetris, R. Todd Constable

Abstract

Age-related variations in resting state connectivity of the human brain were examined from young adulthood through middle age. A voxel-based network measure, degree, was used to assess age-related differences in tissue connectivity throughout the brain. Increases in connectivity with age were found in paralimbic cortical and subcortical regions. Decreases in connectivity were found in cortical regions, including visual areas and the default mode network. These findings differ from those of recent developmental studies examining earlier growth trajectories, and are consistent with known changes in cognitive function and emotional processing during mature aging. The results support and extend previous findings that relied on a priori definitions of regions of interest for their analyses. This approach of applying a voxel-based measure to examine the functional connectivity of individual tissue elements over time, without the need for a priori region of interest definitions, provides an important new tool in brain science.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 87 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 30%
Neuroscience 17 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 12 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,880,816
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#183,928
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,097
of 187,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,375
of 4,282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.