↓ Skip to main content

Aerosol and surface stability of HCoV-19 (SARS-CoV-2) compared to SARS-CoV-1

Overview of attention for article published in medRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 15,533)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
374 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aerosol and surface stability of HCoV-19 (SARS-CoV-2) compared to SARS-CoV-1
Published in
medRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2020.03.09.20033217
Pubmed ID
Authors

van Doremalen, Neeltje, Bushmaker, Trenton, Morris, Dylan H., Holbrook, Myndi G., Gamble, Amandine, Williamson, Brandi N., Tamin, Azaibi, Harcourt, Jennifer L., Thornburg, Natalie J., Gerber, Susan I., Lloyd-Smith, James O., de Wit, Emmie, Munster, Vincent J.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12,273 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 374 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 14%
Student > Master 34 9%
Other 31 8%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Other 84 22%
Unknown 87 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 8%
Engineering 20 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 5%
Other 93 25%
Unknown 100 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10745. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2021.
All research outputs
#67
of 16,638,522 outputs
Outputs from medRxiv
#4
of 15,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13
of 379,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from medRxiv
#1
of 2,137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,638,522 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.