| Title |
Sixty-Day Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Internal Medicine, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.7326/m20-5661 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vineet Chopra, Scott A. Flanders, Megan O’Malley, Anurag N. Malani, Hallie C. Prescott |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5,838 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1801 | 31% |
| Japan | 275 | 5% |
| Canada | 236 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 111 | 2% |
| Australia | 45 | <1% |
| France | 42 | <1% |
| Germany | 33 | <1% |
| Spain | 30 | <1% |
| India | 24 | <1% |
| Other | 350 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2891 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5059 | 87% |
| Scientists | 347 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 294 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 138 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 502 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 502 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 57 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 106 | 21% |
| Unknown | 191 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 150 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 71 | 14% |
| Unknown | 213 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3374. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,679
of 24,503,201 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Internal Medicine
#21
of 13,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111
of 431,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Internal Medicine
#3
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,503,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.