↓ Skip to main content

Perceived truth of statements and simulated social media postings: an experimental investigation of source credibility, repeated exposure, and presentation format

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Perceived truth of statements and simulated social media postings: an experimental investigation of source credibility, repeated exposure, and presentation format
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41235-020-00251-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lena Nadarevic, Rolf Reber, Anne Josephine Helmecke, Dilara Köse

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 63 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 20%
Social Sciences 14 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Design 2 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 60 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,965,008
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#211
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,899
of 437,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.