↓ Skip to main content

Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 2,752)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
3057 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4864 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour
Published in
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, September 2012
DOI 10.1038/nrn3346
Pubmed ID
Authors

John F. Cryan, Timothy G. Dinan

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed the rise of the gut microbiota as a major topic of research interest in biology. Studies are revealing how variations and changes in the composition of the gut microbiota influence normal physiology and contribute to diseases ranging from inflammation to obesity. Accumulating data now indicate that the gut microbiota also communicates with the CNS--possibly through neural, endocrine and immune pathways--and thereby influences brain function and behaviour. Studies in germ-free animals and in animals exposed to pathogenic bacterial infections, probiotic bacteria or antibiotic drugs suggest a role for the gut microbiota in the regulation of anxiety, mood, cognition and pain. Thus, the emerging concept of a microbiota-gut-brain axis suggests that modulation of the gut microbiota may be a tractable strategy for developing novel therapeutics for complex CNS disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 161 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,864 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 51 1%
United Kingdom 12 <1%
Switzerland 9 <1%
Spain 8 <1%
Brazil 8 <1%
Portugal 6 <1%
Italy 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
France 5 <1%
Other 54 1%
Unknown 4701 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 817 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 750 15%
Student > Master 685 14%
Researcher 656 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 247 5%
Other 754 16%
Unknown 955 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1079 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 634 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 505 10%
Neuroscience 400 8%
Psychology 250 5%
Other 872 18%
Unknown 1124 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 598. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2023.
All research outputs
#36,972
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#15
of 2,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117
of 175,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.