↓ Skip to main content

Clinical service organisation for heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical service organisation for heart failure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002752.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Takeda, Stephanie JC Taylor, Rod S Taylor, Faisal Khan, Henry Krum, Martin Underwood

Abstract

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a serious, common condition associated with frequent hospitalisation. Several different disease management interventions (clinical service organisation interventions) for patients with CHF have been proposed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 321 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 21%
Researcher 47 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 10%
Other 30 9%
Student > Bachelor 30 9%
Other 81 24%
Unknown 42 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 153 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 17%
Psychology 21 6%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 43 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2018.
All research outputs
#986,725
of 13,845,567 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,993
of 10,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,652
of 128,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,845,567 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.