↓ Skip to main content

Auditory Processing in High-Functioning Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
46 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Auditory Processing in High-Functioning Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0044084
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne-Marie R. DePape, Geoffrey B. C. Hall, Barbara Tillmann, Laurel J. Trainor

Abstract

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a pervasive developmental disorder including abnormalities in perceptual processing. We measure perception in a battery of tests across speech (filtering, phoneme categorization, multisensory integration) and music (pitch memory, meter categorization, harmonic priming). We found that compared to controls, the ASD group showed poorer filtering, less audio-visual integration, less specialization for native phonemic and metrical categories, and a higher instance of absolute pitch. No group differences were found in harmonic priming. Our results are discussed in a developmental framework where culture-specific knowledge acquired early compared to late in development is most impaired, perhaps because of early-accelerated brain growth in ASD. These results suggest that early auditory remediation is needed for good communication and social functioning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 1%
France 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 266 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 21%
Researcher 42 15%
Student > Master 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Professor 14 5%
Other 54 19%
Unknown 49 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 86 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 8%
Neuroscience 20 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 68 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,010,589
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,972
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,541
of 187,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#175
of 4,282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.