You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Mass Supplementation with Ready-to-Use Supplementary Food during an Anticipated Nutritional Emergency
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0044549 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emmanuel Grellety, Susan Shepherd, Thomas Roederer, Mahamane L. Manzo, Stéphane Doyon, Eric-Alain Ategbo, Rebecca F. Grais |
| Abstract |
Previous studies have shown the benefits of ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF) distribution in reducing the incidence and prevalence of severe acute malnutrition. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Antigua and Barbuda | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Niger | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,212,933
of 25,286,324 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#41,122
of 219,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,979
of 176,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#636
of 4,268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,286,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.