↓ Skip to main content

Magnesium sulphate and other anticonvulsants for women with pre-eclampsia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnesium sulphate and other anticonvulsants for women with pre-eclampsia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000025.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lelia Duley, A Metin Gülmezoglu, David J Henderson-Smart, Doris Chou

Abstract

Eclampsia, the occurrence of a seizure (fit) in association with pre-eclampsia, is rare but potentially life-threatening. Magnesium sulphate is the drug of choice for treating eclampsia. This review assesses its use for preventing eclampsia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 255 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 16%
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Researcher 34 13%
Student > Postgraduate 29 11%
Unspecified 26 10%
Other 82 31%
Unknown 19 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 150 56%
Unspecified 32 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 5%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 19 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2019.
All research outputs
#370,469
of 13,505,887 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,056
of 10,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,742
of 127,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,505,887 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.