↓ Skip to main content

Magnesium sulphate versus diazepam for eclampsia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
404 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnesium sulphate versus diazepam for eclampsia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000127.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lelia Duley, David J Henderson‐Smart, Godfrey JA Walker, Doris Chou

Abstract

Eclampsia, the occurrence of a seizure in association with pre-eclampsia, remains a rare but serious complication of pregnancy. A number of different anticonvulsants are used to control eclamptic fits and to prevent further fits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 393 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 17%
Student > Bachelor 55 14%
Researcher 37 9%
Other 26 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 6%
Other 78 19%
Unknown 113 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 146 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 9%
Social Sciences 25 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 3%
Psychology 13 3%
Other 44 11%
Unknown 125 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,041,648
of 25,389,116 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,115
of 12,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,714
of 189,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,116 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.