↓ Skip to main content

Magnesium sulphate versus diazepam for eclampsia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnesium sulphate versus diazepam for eclampsia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000127.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lelia Duley, David J Henderson-Smart, Godfrey JA Walker, Doris Chou

Abstract

Eclampsia, the occurrence of a seizure in association with pre-eclampsia, remains a rare but serious complication of pregnancy. A number of different anticonvulsants are used to control eclamptic fits and to prevent further fits.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 275 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 21%
Student > Bachelor 42 15%
Researcher 35 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 8%
Student > Postgraduate 19 7%
Other 53 19%
Unknown 53 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 9%
Social Sciences 23 8%
Psychology 11 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 62 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2020.
All research outputs
#775,988
of 16,430,781 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,070
of 11,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,261
of 135,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,430,781 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.