↓ Skip to main content

Magnesium sulphate versus diazepam for eclampsia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnesium sulphate versus diazepam for eclampsia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000127.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lelia Duley, David J Henderson-Smart, Godfrey JA Walker, Doris Chou

Abstract

Eclampsia, the occurrence of a seizure in association with pre-eclampsia, remains a rare but serious complication of pregnancy. A number of different anticonvulsants are used to control eclamptic fits and to prevent further fits.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 195 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 22%
Student > Bachelor 31 15%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Unspecified 20 10%
Other 63 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 53%
Unspecified 26 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Psychology 11 5%
Other 29 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2019.
All research outputs
#574,872
of 13,165,892 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,873
of 10,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,905
of 127,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,165,892 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.