| Title |
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Brazil: a multicenter, prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Jornal de Pediatria, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jped.2020.10.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fernanda Lima-Setta, Maria Clara de Magalhães-Barbosa, Gustavo Rodrigues-Santos, Elaine Augusta das Neves Figueiredo, Melissa de Lorena Jacques, Raquel de Seixas Zeitel, Roberto Sapolnik, Cibelle Teixeira da Siva Borges, Vanessa Soares Lanziotti, Roberta Esteves Vieira de Castro, Ana Paula Novaes Bellinat, Thiago Peres da Silva, Felipe Rezende Caino de Oliveira, Bárbara Carvalho Santos dos Reis, Natália Almeida de Arnaldo Silva Rodriguez Castro, João Henrique Garcia Cobas Macedo, Ana Carolina Cabral Pinheiro Scarlato, Paula Marins Riveiro, Isabele Coelho Fonseca da Mota, Vivian Botelho Lorenzo, Natalia Martins Lima de Lucena, Zina Maria Almeida de Azevedo, Antonio José L.A. Cunha, Arnaldo Prata-Barbosa, for the Brazilian Research Network in Pediatric Intensive Care |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 26% |
| Brazil | 3 | 9% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 6% |
| Argentina | 2 | 6% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 56% |
| Scientists | 8 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 240 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 10% |
| Researcher | 22 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 104 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 118 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,325,375
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pediatria
#16
of 897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,585
of 437,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pediatria
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.