↓ Skip to main content

Deciphering Interactions in Moving Animal Groups

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
253 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deciphering Interactions in Moving Animal Groups
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002678
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacques Gautrais, Francesco Ginelli, Richard Fournier, Stéphane Blanco, Marc Soria, Hugues Chaté, Guy Theraulaz

Abstract

Collective motion phenomena in large groups of social organisms have long fascinated the observer, especially in cases, such as bird flocks or fish schools, where large-scale highly coordinated actions emerge in the absence of obvious leaders. However, the mechanisms involved in this self-organized behavior are still poorly understood, because the individual-level interactions underlying them remain elusive. Here, we demonstrate the power of a bottom-up methodology to build models for animal group motion from data gathered at the individual scale. Using video tracks of fish shoal in a tank, we show how a careful, incremental analysis at the local scale allows for the determination of the stimulus/response function governing an individual's moving decisions. We find in particular that both positional and orientational effects are present, act upon the fish turning speed, and depend on the swimming speed, yielding a novel schooling model whose parameters are all estimated from data. Our approach also leads to identify a density-dependent effect that results in a behavioral change for the largest groups considered. This suggests that, in confined environment, the behavioral state of fish and their reaction patterns change with group size. We debate the applicability, beyond the particular case studied here, of this novel framework for deciphering interactions in moving animal groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 241 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 22%
Researcher 41 16%
Student > Master 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 22 9%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 25%
Physics and Astronomy 57 22%
Engineering 30 12%
Computer Science 21 8%
Environmental Science 8 3%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 40 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2012.
All research outputs
#14,702,809
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#6,038
of 9,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,753
of 188,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#54
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.