↓ Skip to main content

Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004010.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Bugge, Elisabeth J Adams, Deepa Gopinath, Fiona Stewart, Melanie Dembinsky, Pauline Sobiesuo, Rohna Kearney

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 278 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Student > Master 22 8%
Other 17 6%
Student > Postgraduate 11 4%
Researcher 10 4%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 146 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 11%
Psychology 8 3%
Sports and Recreations 6 2%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 158 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#825,006
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,478
of 13,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,591
of 529,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.