@lustefunu @GiulioMarini2 “12219 HCWs participated…prior SARS-CoV-2 infection that generated antibody responses offered protection from reinfection for most people in the six months following infection.” https://t.co/q5V92fbEXG
@ceegarciabee @jarrodf_ @winkypitts @drsimonegold @joerogan Here is a decent study on healthcare workers and natural immunity. Remember when I spoke of anti- S, anti-RBD and anti-N antibodies n how the vax does not elicit anti-N responses but infection doe
@69ayylmao69 @GiorgiaMeloni @FratellidItalia Al momento non ho trovato quest'informazione. Ma vi sono almeno 4 studi che parlano di reinfezione, considerando l'immunità naturale: "Gli anticorpi anti SARS-CoV-2 sono associati alla protezione contro la reinf
https://t.co/cccYY1wbJt prior SARS-CoV-2 infection that generated antibody responses offered protection from reinfection for most people in the six months following infection. 6/17
Study 23 on natural immunity https://t.co/kIcVu8vbc5 #NaturalImmunity #COVID #Vaccination
@ilMentitore @luigi_ferrara Falsità le propali TU con tue accuse,basta! Qui varie ricerche in corso sul tema (oltre ai 200 anni di storia immunologia,dicono i medici senza conflitti!) https://t.co/Rpf6fJuVy9 https://t.co/TmxN9eT6zp https://t.co/2MPToxyN
@biagiosimonetta @luigi_ferrara Sotto solo alcune delle ricerche in corso che lo confermano (oltre ai 200 anni di storia immunologia, dicono i medici onesti..) Quindi falso è cosa?? https://t.co/EX8s47u1XF https://t.co/TmxN9eT6zp https://t.co/Rpf6fJuVy9
@jhillmd Studies say antibodies give protection against reinfection, but there are confirmed cases of reinfection 🤷🏻♂️
@InvisibleStann Official stances from captured govt bodies are not science. As far as the “research not yet showing” how effective natural antibodies are, real science would beg to differ: https://t.co/t17Yxu5Fya https://t.co/Ra0Wkuhg3s https://t.co/30
@Frank23822717 @DanRather @daveonuevo Those of us who actually “trust science” look at data from real medical studies, not cherry picked opinions pushing a narrative. Here are a few to get you started: https://t.co/t17Yxu5Fya https://t.co/Ra0Wkuhg3s htt
A lot of these papers are old “By contrast, Israelis who were vaccinated were 6.72 times more likely to get infected after the shot than after natural infection, with over 3,000 of the 5,193,499, or 0.0578%, of Israelis who were vaccinated getting infected
These facts are selectively suppressed by main stream.
RT @profshanecrotty: 7. These overall COVID-19 immune memory findings are consistent with multiple other labs, including @PepperMarion, Nus…
RT @mab_sp125: E, essa nova infecção pode gerar material genético a ponto de positivar a PCR mas raramente se traduz em uma nova infecção C…
RT @jazzmanahn: Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 are associated with protection against reinfection | medRxiv https://t.co/7VVxxHBOyH
RT @jazzmanahn: Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 are associated with protection against reinfection | medRxiv https://t.co/7VVxxHBOyH
RT @jazzmanahn: Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 are associated with protection against reinfection | medRxiv https://t.co/7VVxxHBOyH
@johnbarwood1 @Covid19Critical @BIRDGroupUK This paper on HCW looks convincing to me: https://t.co/aw8Mt8sa30 This paper sees an effect at the community level, but I haven't scrutinised the data myself: https://t.co/eFQX7wjURu
RT @jazzmanahn: Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 are associated with protection against reinfection | medRxiv https://t.co/7VVxxHBOyH
Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 are associated with protection against reinfection | medRxiv https://t.co/7VVxxHBOyH
RT @profshanecrotty: 7. These overall COVID-19 immune memory findings are consistent with multiple other labs, including @PepperMarion, Nus…
RT @profshanecrotty: 7. These overall COVID-19 immune memory findings are consistent with multiple other labs, including @PepperMarion, Nus…
RT @SonnyCrockett04: @megandraheim @NateSilver538 "We don’t know much about longterm immunity for ppl who’ve had Covid" Very wrong (https:…
@megandraheim @NateSilver538 "We don’t know much about longterm immunity for ppl who’ve had Covid" Very wrong (https://t.co/AjG1BkUFCI) "clearly some are getting it more than once" There's no data to support this "Everyone should get vaccinated" This
RT @profshanecrotty: 7. These overall COVID-19 immune memory findings are consistent with multiple other labs, including @PepperMarion, Nus…
@esedesergio Even though there are case reports of reinfections, a study following 1246 health care workers did not observe symptomatic reinfections over 6 months. https://t.co/pnvbDuXJ4i
Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 are associated with protection against reinfection | medRxiv . Good news against the variants fear propaganda https://t.co/y1dSwMccH7
RT @profshanecrotty: 7. These overall COVID-19 immune memory findings are consistent with multiple other labs, including @PepperMarion, Nus…
@beachvetlbc @GYamey While we don't know (yet) how long vaccine-induced immunity lasts, we are getting a good idea about infection-induced immunity (https://t.co/Bqj0qrF45G or https://t.co/GMbqiolQSw) but the point was about reaching herd immunity, which i
@LegendreMarc @Timeo_Danaos @DocArnica Vous auriez les liens des articles svp ? Je n'ai pas trouve plus de 6 mois https://t.co/7XNapcnBQX (mais de toute facon P.1 s'en fiche donc vaccin pour tout le monde https://t.co/VfOxXqMFu3)
RT @profshanecrotty: 7. These overall COVID-19 immune memory findings are consistent with multiple other labs, including @PepperMarion, Nus…
@TakethatCt @6x10E23 @andrew_croxford SIREN looked at this. Individuals previously infected were 1/4 - 1/5 as likely to be reinfected as those that were seronegative. Though this may change with B.1351/P.1 etc https://t.co/DjDdHtKAKZ
Want something more scientific? This pre-print study found 0 reinfections in 1246 studied patients after 6 months. If one had been reinfected, that would still only be a reinfection rate of 0.08%. https://t.co/nEqd53ex8P
The preprint “Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 are associated with prote…” (https://t.co/3CXZbq4x7w) has been reviewed by automated tools, find results here: https://t.co/6BUZo62pbp. We detected 1 of 5 rigor criteria, 6 resources, and no limitations statement.
RT @profshanecrotty: 7. These overall COVID-19 immune memory findings are consistent with multiple other labs, including @PepperMarion, Nus…
@HeckofaLiberal @davecoghlan @afamilyguy @liefkoffie @EricTopol As I said, the data does NOT support your wishful thinking. Yes, reinfections are not wide spread, but they are common. And some are severe...just like regular infection is 90% mild and 5% sev
@AlexisBrassey @AdamJKucharski https://t.co/WbAels5JqA is a systematic study, but caveats apply regarding false positive antibody testing. The most convincing smoking gun I've seen was someone who was sequenced twice and had clearly different strains, but
RT @profshanecrotty: 7. These overall COVID-19 immune memory findings are consistent with multiple other labs, including @PepperMarion, Nus…
RT @profshanecrotty: 7. These overall COVID-19 immune memory findings are consistent with multiple other labs, including @PepperMarion, Nus…
RT @profshanecrotty: 7. These overall COVID-19 immune memory findings are consistent with multiple other labs, including @PepperMarion, Nus…
@dickyblow @SwaledaleMutton When compared with new infections in uninfected group, the previously infected were ~x4 less likely to be reinfected https://t.co/rwMdcNIiwN
RT @profshanecrotty: 7. These overall COVID-19 immune memory findings are consistent with multiple other labs, including @PepperMarion, Nus…
@TrishtheSkeptic @meganranney @kadelia @justin_hart @JCinQC For a scientific citation, see https://t.co/AjG1BkUFCI
@LucioMM1 @scary_biscuits seems consistent (in seeing a roughtly 4-fold reduction in risk of infection, and some risk reduction in outcomes beyond that) with https://t.co/6V5n9tye9M this makes some vaccines better at giving immunity than natural infection
RT @kateleyritana: Gaano katagal kang immune from COVID after recovering from the disease? Oxford study - 6 mos https://t.co/8nLtvfzdb0
Gaano katagal kang immune from COVID after recovering from the disease? Oxford study - 6 mos https://t.co/8nLtvfzdb0
RT @masan2014: ようやく探していた再感染の論文が出てきました。 再感染は全体の0.67% 一方、新規感染は全体の2.91% 一度感染すると、感染リスクは1/4に下がるが、決して稀れではないとのこと。再感染の有症状率は新規感染の半分。 https://t.co/J…
RT @masan2014: ようやく探していた再感染の論文が出てきました。 再感染は全体の0.67% 一方、新規感染は全体の2.91% 一度感染すると、感染リスクは1/4に下がるが、決して稀れではないとのこと。再感染の有症状率は新規感染の半分。
RT @masan2014: ようやく探していた再感染の論文が出てきました。 再感染は全体の0.67% 一方、新規感染は全体の2.91% 一度感染すると、感染リスクは1/4に下がるが、決して稀れではないとのこと。再感染の有症状率は新規感染の半分。 https://t.co/J…
RT @masan2014: ようやく探していた再感染の論文が出てきました。 再感染は全体の0.67% 一方、新規感染は全体の2.91% 一度感染すると、感染リスクは1/4に下がるが、決して稀れではないとのこと。再感染の有症状率は新規感染の半分。 https://t.co/J…
ようやく探していた再感染の論文が出てきました。 再感染は全体の0.67% 一方、新規感染は全体の2.91% 一度感染すると、感染リスクは1/4に下がるが、決して稀れではないとのこと。再感染の有症状率は新規感染の半分。
RT @VirpiFlyg: Thread about reinfections. They are not rare. https://t.co/5sSzgxD09o
RT @OrenKobiler: שני מאמרים (לפני ביקורת עמיתים) על הדבקה חוזרת בצוותים הרפואיים באנגליה. מעקב אחרי מעל 6000 נדבקים. הדבקה בנגיף מקנה חסינו…
RT @OrenKobiler: שני מאמרים (לפני ביקורת עמיתים) על הדבקה חוזרת בצוותים הרפואיים באנגליה. מעקב אחרי מעל 6000 נדבקים. הדבקה בנגיף מקנה חסינו…
The data
שני מאמרים (לפני ביקורת עמיתים) על הדבקה חוזרת בצוותים הרפואיים באנגליה. מעקב אחרי מעל 6000 נדבקים. הדבקה בנגיף מקנה חסינות של בין 70-85% (כמו חיסון לא רע) לחצי שנה. כמעט חצי סימפטומטים בהדבקה החוזרת. רוב המקרים לפני התפשטות הווריאנטים החדשים באנגליה.
RT @gabayd: מחקר על הדבקות חוזרות בקורונה בטווח חצי שנה מההדבקה הראשונה. המסקנה - זה לא מאד נדיר.
מחקר על הדבקות חוזרות בקורונה בטווח חצי שנה מההדבקה הראשונה. המסקנה - זה לא מאד נדיר.
RT @BhadeliaMD: A good review of UK paper of reinfections among healthcare workers by @K_G_Andersen Group saw reinfections in 0.67% . New…
RT @BhadeliaMD: A good review of UK paper of reinfections among healthcare workers by @K_G_Andersen Group saw reinfections in 0.67% . New…
RT @VirpiFlyg: Thread about reinfections. They are not rare. https://t.co/5sSzgxD09o
RT @VirpiFlyg: Thread about reinfections. They are not rare. https://t.co/5sSzgxD09o
RT @VirpiFlyg: Thread about reinfections. They are not rare.
RT @BhadeliaMD: A good review of UK paper of reinfections among healthcare workers by @K_G_Andersen Group saw reinfections in 0.67% . New…
RT @BhadeliaMD: A good review of UK paper of reinfections among healthcare workers by @K_G_Andersen Group saw reinfections in 0.67% . New…
RT @BhadeliaMD: A good review of UK paper of reinfections among healthcare workers by @K_G_Andersen Group saw reinfections in 0.67% . New…
RT @BhadeliaMD: A good review of UK paper of reinfections among healthcare workers by @K_G_Andersen Group saw reinfections in 0.67% . New…
RT @BhadeliaMD: A good review of UK paper of reinfections among healthcare workers by @K_G_Andersen Group saw reinfections in 0.67% . New…
RT @BhadeliaMD: A good review of UK paper of reinfections among healthcare workers by @K_G_Andersen Group saw reinfections in 0.67% . New…
RT @BhadeliaMD: A good review of UK paper of reinfections among healthcare workers by @K_G_Andersen Group saw reinfections in 0.67% . New…
RT @BhadeliaMD: A good review of UK paper of reinfections among healthcare workers by @K_G_Andersen Group saw reinfections in 0.67% . New…
RT @BhadeliaMD: A good review of UK paper of reinfections among healthcare workers by @K_G_Andersen Group saw reinfections in 0.67% . New…
Thread about reinfections. They are not rare.
However, a new preprint from Public Health England shows reinfections ticking upward among a good portion of previously infected people starting around 5 months. https://t.co/kmcF0vErZg https://t.co/RHT3I05211
RT @BhadeliaMD: A good review of UK paper of reinfections among healthcare workers by @K_G_Andersen Group saw reinfections in 0.67% . New…
RT @BhadeliaMD: A good review of UK paper of reinfections among healthcare workers by @K_G_Andersen Group saw reinfections in 0.67% . New…
A good review of UK paper of reinfections among healthcare workers by @K_G_Andersen Group saw reinfections in 0.67% . New infections in 2.91% About 4 fold reduction in risk. Symptomatic infections in reinfections were half (34%) of those seen in new in
fuente https://t.co/EOqW6CDFOj (descarga pdf) este https://t.co/1wuWfsILrD encontraba 76%, así que creo que se puede aproximar a hacer la infección 4 veces menos probable. Además, cuando ocurre, tiene tendencia a ser más leve: solo 34% sintomáticos fren
RT K_G_Andersen https://t.co/aSm68xWmks "Okay, paper is here: https://t.co/WWywbJOlTg. Some key summary points: Reinfections in 0.67% of cohort New infections in 2.91% of cohort These numbers are consistent with a ~4x reduction in risk, which w
RT @giorgiogilestro: Per inciso, questo non è il primo studio su questo argomento, solo il più recente. Studi precedenti avevano mostrato c…
Per inciso, questo non è il primo studio su questo argomento, solo il più recente. Studi precedenti avevano mostrato conclusioni simili. (eg: https://t.co/4T6RLhBF82 ). Le domande aperte rimangono sempre: durata effetiva della protezione e capacità delle v
Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 are associated with protection against reinfection https://t.co/14FvGVD6o3
RT @profshanecrotty: 7. These overall COVID-19 immune memory findings are consistent with multiple other labs, including @PepperMarion, Nus…
RT @profshanecrotty: 7. These overall COVID-19 immune memory findings are consistent with multiple other labs, including @PepperMarion, Nus…
RT @profshanecrotty: 7. These overall COVID-19 immune memory findings are consistent with multiple other labs, including @PepperMarion, Nus…