You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Cytogenetic analysis of three Ctenidae species (Araneae) from the Amazon
Genetics and Molecular Biology, January 2020
José Paulo da Costa Pinto Neto, Leonardo Gusso Goll, Maria Claudia Gross, Eliana Feldsberg, Carlos Henrique Schneider
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||50%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||2||33%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||17%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||1||17%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||17%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||33%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||33%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from Genetics and Molecular Biology
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 457,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics and Molecular Biology
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.