You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Emergency Room Validation of the Revised Suicide Trigger Scale (STS-3): A Measure of a Hypothesized Suicide Trigger State
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0045157 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zimri S. Yaseen, Evan Gilmer, Janki Modi, Lisa J. Cohen, Igor I. Galynker |
| Abstract |
The Suicide Trigger Scale (STS) was designed to measure the construct of an affective 'suicide trigger state.' This study aims to extend the inpatient setting validation study of the original Suicide Trigger Scale version 2 to the revised Suicide Trigger Scale version 3 (STS-3) in an acute psychiatric emergency room setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,050,333
of 24,917,903 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#50,145
of 216,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,150
of 175,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#787
of 4,277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,917,903 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.