↓ Skip to main content

Cov-hep study: heparin in standard anticoagulation based on citrate for continuous veno-venous hemodialysis in patients with COVID-19: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
Title
Cov-hep study: heparin in standard anticoagulation based on citrate for continuous veno-venous hemodialysis in patients with COVID-19: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13063-020-04814-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo Ricardo Gessolo Lins, Claudia Coimbra César de Albuquerque, Camila Fernandes Assis, Bruna Cristine Duarte Rodrigues, Beatriz Pinto e Siqueira Campos, Eduardo de Oliveira Valle, Carla Paulina Sandoval Cabrera, Jeison de Oliveira Gois, Gabriela Cardoso Segura, Fernando Louzada Strufaldi, Lorena Catelan Mainardes, Rayra Gomes Ribeiro, Daniela Del Pilar Via Reque Cortes, Luciana Gil Lutf, Márcia Fernanda Arantes de Oliveira, Gabriel Teixeira Montezuma Sales, Igor Smolentzov, Bernardo Vergara Reichert, Lucia Andrade, Victor Faria Seabra, Camila Eleuterio Rodrigues

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 185 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Researcher 17 9%
Other 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 70 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Psychology 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 78 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2021.
All research outputs
#17,155,195
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,241
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,664
of 437,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.