↓ Skip to main content

Conservation cobenefits from air pollution regulation: Evidence from birds

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
95 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservation cobenefits from air pollution regulation: Evidence from birds
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2020
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2013568117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuanning Liang, Ivan Rudik, Eric Yongchen Zou, Alison Johnston, Amanda D Rodewald, Catherine L Kling

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Professor 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 26 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 22%
Environmental Science 12 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 13%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 34 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 325. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#105,597
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#2,304
of 103,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,009
of 529,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#51
of 1,024 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,024 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.