Title |
No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-19818-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lucy van Dorp, Damien Richard, Cedric C. S. Tan, Liam P. Shaw, Mislav Acman, François Balloux |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,641 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 768 | 21% |
United States | 230 | 6% |
Turkey | 83 | 2% |
South Africa | 74 | 2% |
Spain | 55 | 2% |
Canada | 47 | 1% |
France | 33 | <1% |
Australia | 32 | <1% |
Japan | 31 | <1% |
Other | 400 | 11% |
Unknown | 1888 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3124 | 86% |
Scientists | 304 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 153 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 55 | 2% |
Unknown | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 392 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 78 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 41 | 10% |
Student > Master | 37 | 9% |
Other | 19 | 5% |
Other | 78 | 20% |
Unknown | 97 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 96 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 11% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 21 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 2% |
Other | 59 | 15% |
Unknown | 112 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3798. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,389
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#17
of 58,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95
of 529,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#3
of 1,459 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,459 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.