RT @JaneDryden4: @skepticalzebra @SimonClarkeMP @Calum92Stevens 46,723 of them in Sept 2020 - and NONE of them had any significant effect o…
RT @stephiekeachie: @SimonClarkeMP are you really saying borders due to variants of that’s the case they are closed forever as there will a…
@SimonClarkeMP are you really saying borders due to variants of that’s the case they are closed forever as there will always be variants we’ve had over 40,000 variants since September @CharlesWalkerMP @bbclaurak
RT @JaneDryden4: @skepticalzebra @SimonClarkeMP @Calum92Stevens 46,723 of them in Sept 2020 - and NONE of them had any significant effect o…
@OttawaCitizen The variant count is very high. It is not in single digits. Over 250K talked about here https://t.co/vQSV0DCXTO
RT @Metabo_PhD: @COVIDZeroPoint0 Hey @COVIDZeroPoint0 team, there are ~12,000 variants published in Novemeber of last year. As of now, it’s…
RT @BallouxFrancois: To give some context to the recent announcement of a new #SARSCoV2 variant/mutation, it may be helpful to realise that…
RT @Metabo_PhD: @COVIDZeroPoint0 Hey @COVIDZeroPoint0 team, there are ~12,000 variants published in Novemeber of last year. As of now, it’s…
RT @BallouxFrancois: To give some context to the recent announcement of a new #SARSCoV2 variant/mutation, it may be helpful to realise that…
6 absolutely unnecessary and demonstrably harmful vaccine for which there is no meaningful data???!!! And then I would like to draw your attention on this https://t.co/Avg41gQ9vt again, because that is exactly what was meant by it!! "Instead, recurrent mut
@COVIDZeroPoint0 Hey @COVIDZeroPoint0 team, there are ~12,000 variants published in Novemeber of last year. As of now, it’s likely that there are around 60,000 variants, if not more. I’m sure a friendly neighbourhood Scarborough variant is hiding in there
@Maldonato7 @a_1_0_2_ @Monox5 @roropapa4 @raoult_didier Pardon mais n'est pas le seul à savoir qu'un virus ça mute... On recensait déjà 12 000 mutation a l'été, et jusqu'à septembre, aucun n'avait eu d'effet majeur. Sortez de votre secte un peu, le monde e
@aberron, como siempre, poniendo algo de luz en el maremágnum informativo de la pandemia. Casi ya un año de otro que, por primera vez, me hizo tomar conciencia de que esto era mucho más que una gripe.
RT @aberron: Sale ahora un paper de Lucy van Dorp en Nature Communications que dice que las variantes nuevas del virus no tienen mayor tran…
RT @aberron: Sale ahora un paper de Lucy van Dorp en Nature Communications que dice que las variantes nuevas del virus no tienen mayor tran…
RT @mantaypeli: La ‘cepa británica’ o cómo seguir echándole la culpa a otros de la ineptitud propia. 👇🏻
Como dice Antonio, y en línea con lo que comentábamos el otro día: es perfectamente posible leer un paper que dice una cosa y otro que dice la contraria. Que los dos se hayan hecho con rigor metodológico. Que ninguno tenga fallos gordos. Así es la ciencia.
RT @aberron: Sale ahora un paper de Lucy van Dorp en Nature Communications que dice que las variantes nuevas del virus no tienen mayor tran…
RT @Joaquin_Sevilla: Este hilo Mucha razón
RT @aberron: Sale ahora un paper de Lucy van Dorp en Nature Communications que dice que las variantes nuevas del virus no tienen mayor tran…
Este hilo Mucha razón
RT @aberron: Sale ahora un paper de Lucy van Dorp en Nature Communications que dice que las variantes nuevas del virus no tienen mayor tran…
@fascinatorfun @breeallegretti I know right... https://t.co/6VAS5pKiGL
@GVJUANCA @NNnadramija Esto es falso. Este el es link de este artículo publicado en NOVIEMBRE del 2020 https://t.co/Z42Qnm3LHc
@covid_clarity This guy... maybe someone could update?
RT @quantumposition: @ZDFheute „dramatisch“. Ja ja. #Angstagenda https://t.co/DSN3GS636N Studie - No evidence for increased transmissibilit…
RT @quantumposition: @ZDFheute „dramatisch“. Ja ja. #Angstagenda https://t.co/DSN3GS636N Studie - No evidence for increased transmissibilit…
@ZDFheute „dramatisch“. Ja ja. #Angstagenda https://t.co/DSN3GS636N Studie - No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations https://t.co/43GKPkQRXT Aus Studien lernen: damit haben es LeiDmedien und Regierungen nicht so. Mit Blick auf
@ZDFheute suggeriert gerne weiter die angebliche Zustimmung. Wenn @ZDFheute endlich mal gemäß des Pressekodex objektiv und allumfassend aufklären würde, wäre das Ergebnis ganz anders. https://t.co/lWY2xYnAa0 Studie: https://t.co/1dF3vV7D6r +++ https:/
@merkur_de @fr @Markus_Soeder @an_clauss Studie - No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/43GKPkQRXT
@merkur_de @fr @Markus_Soeder @an_clauss Studie - No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/43GKPkQRXT
RT @BallouxFrancois: To give some context to the recent announcement of a new #SARSCoV2 variant/mutation, it may be helpful to realise that…
Quellen: 1) Forscher analysierten alle 398 bekannten Corona-Mutationen — bisher wurde das Virus nicht gefährlicher https://t.co/7G8Ec5h83Z 2) Studie - No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/1M25A6NpiY
@ledelhace Hollanda’da yaşıyorz dünyayı bir karakol merkezne çevirdilr ve insanlr hâlâ konu SAĞLIK sanıyor.onlra attığm maille bunlr.Mutasyn geçirdği söylenn Sars cov2 bahsi geçn virsle üzerne 2000’e yakn genom analz ve bulaşıcılığna dair hiçbr kanıtn olma
@lucius_antiquus @NedyNadija S tou nakazlivosti je to nepravdepodobne https://t.co/Mx9k8csQqg
@Suwa33224991 @mariodujakovic @RadioWienHeute 4 https://t.co/Avg41gQ9vt We apply this index to a curated set of recurrent mutations identified in a dataset of 46,723 SARS-CoV-2 genomes isolated from patients worldwide. We do not identify a single recurring
RT @ykfrs1217: @minesoh (専門用語で失礼します。)「変異株の割合が増えた」だけだと創始者効果や遺伝的浮動の可能性が多分にありますが、「絶対数として感染者が増える」のは創始者効果では説明できません。D614Gでは、前者の可能性が高いまま残っています 1:h…
RT @ykfrs1217: @minesoh (専門用語で失礼します。)「変異株の割合が増えた」だけだと創始者効果や遺伝的浮動の可能性が多分にありますが、「絶対数として感染者が増える」のは創始者効果では説明できません。D614Gでは、前者の可能性が高いまま残っています 1:h…
News vs. Science! https://t.co/We6EUWiwii
@BryanRetallick @BBCNews Individually these mutations have been studied. They have no impact. Combined this may be different. https://t.co/gY0HLLlo0q
RT @ykfrs1217: @minesoh (専門用語で失礼します。)「変異株の割合が増えた」だけだと創始者効果や遺伝的浮動の可能性が多分にありますが、「絶対数として感染者が増える」のは創始者効果では説明できません。D614Gでは、前者の可能性が高いまま残っています 1:h…
RT @ykfrs1217: @minesoh (専門用語で失礼します。)「変異株の割合が増えた」だけだと創始者効果や遺伝的浮動の可能性が多分にありますが、「絶対数として感染者が増える」のは創始者効果では説明できません。D614Gでは、前者の可能性が高いまま残っています 1:h…
@minesoh (専門用語で失礼します。)「変異株の割合が増えた」だけだと創始者効果や遺伝的浮動の可能性が多分にありますが、「絶対数として感染者が増える」のは創始者効果では説明できません。D614Gでは、前者の可能性が高いまま残っています 1:https://t.co/HNs2TLHdIZ 2:https://t.co/xsVMFGUkKa
Mutations No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Communications @SteveBakerHW @Mark_J_Harper https://t.co/KLqHWMur7p
RT @minesoh: ありがとうございます👶 どうしても考えてしまうのは、D614G の時にも似たようなプレプリントを読んでいたのですが、のちにいろいろ説がでてきて、モデルでいっていたことがうまく証明できていないこともあると思っているのです。 https://t.co/nN…
RT @minesoh: ありがとうございます👶 どうしても考えてしまうのは、D614G の時にも似たようなプレプリントを読んでいたのですが、のちにいろいろ説がでてきて、モデルでいっていたことがうまく証明できていないこともあると思っているのです。 https://t.co/nN…
RT @minesoh: ありがとうございます👶 どうしても考えてしまうのは、D614G の時にも似たようなプレプリントを読んでいたのですが、のちにいろいろ説がでてきて、モデルでいっていたことがうまく証明できていないこともあると思っているのです。 https://t.co/nN…
RT @minesoh: ありがとうございます👶 どうしても考えてしまうのは、D614G の時にも似たようなプレプリントを読んでいたのですが、のちにいろいろ説がでてきて、モデルでいっていたことがうまく証明できていないこともあると思っているのです。 https://t.co/nN…
ありがとうございます👶 どうしても考えてしまうのは、D614G の時にも似たようなプレプリントを読んでいたのですが、のちにいろいろ説がでてきて、モデルでいっていたことがうまく証明できていないこともあると思っているのです。 https://t.co/nNs8SCOOSH
RT @mipardudire: Breve comunicado anti #coviots sobre las MUTACIONES SARS-CoV-2 VIH muta 100 veces al año Influenza 50 SARS-CoV-2 25 Ning…
@TheRoaminRob @dianaberrent @PBS @NewsHour @drwilliamli @angio_org @JudyWoodruff @lornabaldwin @Survivor_Corps @drsanjaygupta @VinGuptaMD @greta @NicolleDWallace @DrEricDing It's actually mutating slower than many other viruses https://t.co/S2P98jkMiU
8) Most mutations don’t have much of an effect. This is because protein chains are so long that one amino acid substitution doesn’t really change much. This was shown in the following article on SARS-CoV-2. No mutation *alone* impacted transmission. http
@MailOnline ‘N501Y mutation makes the spike protein better at binding to receptors in people's bodies and therefore makes the virus more infectious.’ This isn’t true. Research into the effects of N501Y have shown that ‘alone’ it’s unlikely to impact trans
@tdjooo @SBergsma Het idee dat mutaties zoveel gevaarlijker zijn wordt niet direct door de wetenschap ondersteund: https://t.co/UqdvQPaEBR
#zajob "Brak dowodów na zwiększoną zdolność przenoszenia z nawracających mutacji w SARS-CoV-2" @PKontrowersje https://t.co/0hwaVEE329
👇
Asymptomatic transmission of covid risk is practically zero. Out of 10 million contact tracing data points, they found 300 cases of Asymptomatic transmission to another person. https://t.co/Xz1JhmmscH
@RebelNewsOnline No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/KnY5KfIagy
RT @techverbatim: @Adam_Creighton A relevant research paper https://t.co/AVUUcdYefZ
@Adam_Creighton A relevant research paper https://t.co/AVUUcdYefZ
I'm guessing @AnnastaciaMP and her CHO haven't seen this research paper showing a lack of increased transmission between the different viral mutations. But hey, they're "following the best of health advice", right? https://t.co/AVUUcdYefZ
@pekweet Nuohan ei perustu varsinaiseen mallinnukseen, vaan ihan vaan huomioon, että D614G yleistyi. Vrt. esim.: https://t.co/Nozk4HKEtW
RT @BallouxFrancois: Paper out in Nature Comms. We developed a framework to analyse the contribution of #SARSCoV2 mutations to the virus' t…
RT @BallouxFrancois: To give some context to the recent announcement of a new #SARSCoV2 variant/mutation, it may be helpful to realise that…
@Dijosti It’s a variant, not a new strain and there’s already more than 12 000 worldwide because that’s what viruses do
RT @BretEschman: A bit of good news and some solid info regarding potential mutations in SARS-CoV-2. https://t.co/35CR7dT7os
@MuusaK @RopponeTuomas @riikka_kevo @JohannaVendelin @Vapaavuori Ihan noin yksioikoisia johtopäätöksiä ei voi vetää. ”distinguishing neutral mutations (whose frequencies have increased through demographic processes) from adaptive mutations (which directly
A bit of good news and some solid info regarding potential mutations in SARS-CoV-2. https://t.co/35CR7dT7os
@fhuszar Haven't looked at the actual data (not qualified to infer much about it anyway), but I trust @BallouxFrancois's expertise. See e.g. https://t.co/Ltb2YvYNBd https://t.co/CRkMSHFoml https://t.co/iFqx4d0s22 TL;DR: is it more transmissible? Strong "m
@VoChristopher @FfmRalf @stohr_klaus Er ist nicht der einzige
RT @BallouxFrancois: To give some context to the recent announcement of a new #SARSCoV2 variant/mutation, it may be helpful to realise that…
RT @Andrew9Boswell: Well it now is very likely that VOC 202012/01 makes @NatureComms paper out-of-date👉 https://t.co/b35egVTFH2 And increa…
【 SARS-CoV-2 】 https://t.co/imUCbdSgmH
@Sports_bios @DeadLiftCapital @Biomaven This great paper from @BallouxFrancois et all seems to imply that that risk is not as high as assumed, as we have seen many mutations conferring no advantage already https://t.co/CicOFEXXPo
RT @minesoh: それが、11月にこんな論文がでます👶 No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/gChWsHvY1t
Of the objections I have seen against this one major objection remains unadressed: "the partial protection will lead to selective pressure and an escape variant", but I think @BallouxFrancois wonderful study implies this is risk low enough we can take it
RT @BallouxFrancois: To give some context to the recent announcement of a new #SARSCoV2 variant/mutation, it may be helpful to realise that…
@VishalGulati_ @ethanjweiss With even higher stakes it feels like if the mutation evolution pressure argument holds water... Though I feel the findings of @BallouxFrancois et all should give some comfort even in this new situation, what's good already is
RT @minesoh: それが、11月にこんな論文がでます👶 No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/gChWsHvY1t
@bangkokpotter @RichardBarrow The most advanced methods in showing no increased transmission according to experts at UCL ? https://t.co/b5VSq80GkF
RT @minesoh: それが、11月にこんな論文がでます👶 No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/gChWsHvY1t
RT @minesoh: それが、11月にこんな論文がでます👶 No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/gChWsHvY1t
RT @minesoh: それが、11月にこんな論文がでます👶 No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/gChWsHvY1t
RT @minesoh: それが、11月にこんな論文がでます👶 No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/gChWsHvY1t
RT @minesoh: それが、11月にこんな論文がでます👶 No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/gChWsHvY1t
RT @minesoh: それが、11月にこんな論文がでます👶 No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/gChWsHvY1t
RT @minesoh: それが、11月にこんな論文がでます👶 No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/gChWsHvY1t