@1smyy_ @BulutGulcuN Şunu da şöööyle bi bırakayım olurda bakmak isteyen olursa diye..
@Jim_OMallie Sure. We were anticipating immune escape strains well before the vaccine was deployed, but to the best of my knowledge no one expected they'd come in the form of strains that had undergone massive mutational leaps. https://t.co/DjljsFsVhf
Sure, it is possible to find panglossians back in 2020 saying you'd only ever need the initial covid vaccine doses. But better scientists in 2020 were saying of course the virus would mutate and require vaccine updates.
@Asheswillfall1 @EricRWeinstein Some scientists in 2020 were saying that the virus will mutate just like influenza and require vaccine updates. Here's an example: https://t.co/bP70fmPrQu
@mtaibbi @joerogan @PeterHotez @0rf There were scientists in 2020 saying covid would mutate like influenza and need vaccine updates. But these people weren't getting much attention in the press. Example: https://t.co/bP70fmPrQu
@gadboit Not really, no ... https://t.co/yLpOcbtHvo https://t.co/MdxcZUJBS9
@m_a_martin @emmecola @macroliter @past_is_future @RemindMe_OfThis Thank you, I suspect the rate of transmissions associated to 2 mutations was a bit higher in the very early stages of the pandemic, with a lot of C->U mutations induced by the human inna
Balloux's track record on COVID-19 origins & variants is at best of mixed quality. He publicly backed @WashburneAlex's clownish analysis of restriction sites (opposite of what you'd see in a "domesticated" genome). And this paper of his was obviously w
RT @macroliter: @BallouxFrancois @alchemytoday @past_is_future @RemindMe_OfThis You seem confused. And have been repeatedly & unambiguously…
@BallouxFrancois @alchemytoday @past_is_future @RemindMe_OfThis You seem confused. And have been repeatedly & unambiguously wrong.. in both tweet threads and publications. For example, (although your support for Washburne’s absurd “analysis” was frankl
it really had a fitness advantage or this was just luck ("founder effect"), and usually concluding that the evidence for an actual fitness advantage was not strong enough. It was well known before The Science that the bar for showing that a variant is...
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
@LisaMarOz @zbingledack @niswarth Am I not understanding these sources as well? "these viruses still acquire some mutations as they spread from host to host." https://t.co/Hu4xHOt2b7 "mean pairwise SNP difference across isolates of 8.4 (4.7–13.5, 95% co
@SeiSenryaku @LoThOdes @ManonAubryFr Tortue... nous sommes à quel nombres de mutations à ce jours sur celui-ci...?https://t.co/RQklBoOEAz
RT @lissnup: advantage to drive exponential emergence of a non-CGG variant, which make the mutation non-permanent (non-selected for). https…
advantage to drive exponential emergence of a non-CGG variant, which make the mutation non-permanent (non-selected for). https://t.co/DCXabrywXh … the result is the lack of recurrence (dS too torturous to achieve starting with a CGG in coronavirus mutagene
@jsm2334 @_Kodos_ @pjakma @SaltaoVladimir Opinion is still divided on whether D614G was really more transmissible or it was just founder effect. See for example below. It later became fashionable to jump to conclusions instantly about transmissibility bas
@AThankless @BallouxFrancois @healthbyjames @karamballes @MAbsoud I'm not gonna repeat myself until you understand. Plus Balloux also replied to you to explain it in even more detail. Plus a reference. Read until you understand. 😋 https://t.co/KE6Q5OYWMB
@AThankless @Florin_Uncovers @healthbyjames @karamballes @MAbsoud Lots of people predict lots of things. What I mean is that pre-Alpha, we didn't observe meaningful change in transmissibility. I failed to anticipate the rare bursts of mutations in immunoco
@quay_dr Thank you. That's correct. Note that early on, there was very little selective pressure for immune escape. We ran a similar analysis in mid-2020 and had some hits in the spike/RBD. 1/ https://t.co/yLpOcbufkW
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
@KerryAnnAnn @tomselliott @JReinerMD And wrong…again. https://t.co/Uszp9zXxa2
@jsm2334 @juli_bg_bs Here it is. They called it the "RoHO score". Interesting how much debate there was (and still is) about whether D614G was really better or just "founder effect" before 🇬🇧 gov founded the tradition of just asserting that each variant wa
RT @tolgaozcelkk008: SARS-CoV-2'de tekrarlayan mutasyonlardan bulaşabilirliğin arttığına dair kanıt yok Korona virüs her insanın vücudunda…
RT @mv42g: @SGriffin_Lab Nov 2020, just as Alpha was starting it’s ascent over the ancestral strain, the said uber “centrist” gave us this…
@fitterhappierAJ @mildanalyst @justaneighsayer What, this one? The one that he used to back up his tweets predicting there would be no serious variants just before Δ arrived? https://t.co/jFPVgKG8CQ
RT @tolgaozcelkk008: Bilimsel kanıt SARS-CoV-2'de tekrarlayan mutasyonlardan bulaşabilirliğin arttığına dair kanıt yok COVID-19'a, 2019'un…
RT @dianacalibana: @Fabopolis @IzzoEdo @BallouxFrancois Mah... parliamo di cose serie: un articolo su Nature Comm accettato il 30 ottobre 2…
@Fabopolis @IzzoEdo @BallouxFrancois Mah... parliamo di cose serie: un articolo su Nature Comm accettato il 30 ottobre 2020. Alle soglie della variante alfa aka inglese. "There is no a priori reason..." https://t.co/LqRPhpkNbS https://t.co/pq6DZaTVqe
@RaviHVJ @doctorasadkhan @loscharlos @ShaneyWright I see however this paper co authored by Francois and published in the much less prestigious Nature Communications from 2020. Offered without comment, especially as regards what we know now about SARS-CoV-2
RT @tolgaozcelk007: Bilimsel Yayın SARS-CoV-2'de tekrarlayan mutasyonlardan bulaşabilirliğin arttığına dair kanıt yok COVID-19'a, 2019'un…
RT @Daoyu15: https://t.co/GWfCc43GaR In addition, prophylaxis efforts are important in shaping viral evolution—VOCs did not arrive before t…
RT @tlgozclk909: SARS-CoV-2'de tekrarlayan mutasyonlardan bulaşabilirliğin arttığına dair kanıt yok COVID-19'a, 2019'un sonlarında henüz ta…
RT @tlgozclk909: SARS-CoV-2'de tekrarlayan mutasyonlardan bulaşabilirliğin arttığına dair kanıt yok COVID-19'a, 2019'un sonlarında henüz ta…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
SARS-CoV-2'de tekrarlayan mutasyonlardan bulaşabilirliğin arttığına dair kanıt yok COVID-19'a, 2019'un sonlarında henüz tanımlanmamış bir hayvan rezervuarından insan popülasyonuna sıçrayan koronavirüs SARS-CoV-2 neden olur. 25 Kasım 2020 https://t.co/1XNS
RT @aberron: Sale ahora un paper de Lucy van Dorp en Nature Communications que dice que las variantes nuevas del virus no tienen mayor tran…
RT @aberron: Sale ahora un paper de Lucy van Dorp en Nature Communications que dice que las variantes nuevas del virus no tienen mayor tran…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively inc…
Balloux's science has been off the mark, if not downright misleading The changes here were found to definitively increase transmission, contrary to what balloux says https://t.co/mLpl0w32m9
@Tristan_JPR severe side effects were already known 2 months after the beginning!!! Gullibility does NOT protect from harm!!! https://t.co/uSWovRbdGa - https://t.co/T9epqEspdc - https://t.co/h6FJDOKoXL if already in 2006 a fixed, synthetic primer for thi
RT @Daoyu15: @BiophysicsFL @emmecola “Impossible”, nearly every site in early SARS-CoV-2 mutations recurs. And in stead of ~120000 mutation…
https://t.co/qQm7nCr2lk - https://t.co/bFzL4aV7iA - https://t.co/CdWQlicy4m - and besides, where are these so-called "special variants" supposed to have come from, since there were already 46,723 immune-induced https://t.co/FvBFSZktul , i.e. completely har
RT @2dedostesta: “No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2” 👉 ”SARS-CoV-2 can be considered as a s…
@TheTropaion @emmecola @stuartjdneil You’re very kind (and we need more of that here) but virologists failed to predict, identify or even acknowledge evolution toward increased transmission. Instead we got innumerate analyses like https://t.co/Xnr1wRXT1A
@QuillaaaTe @viennasky @M_T_Franz d subtract the peer review here, then you know that https://t.co/kHIPO2RFRZ - masks were and are a business model at 1. manipulate peoples, 2. to keep the fear alive and 3. drive people into these conditionally authorised,
Here is another #badtake claiming neutral evolution not adaptation in SARS-CoV-2: https://t.co/dMkDuhc2t4
@james__glen @patientled @AthenaAkrami @Nature I am looking at Francois's CV and I am seeing a lot of papers published in scientific journals of much lower standing than Nature. Including this drop of wisdom about SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/tyXIoy3Wym
@M_Ziesmann @EinheitSI @hendrikstreeck c https://t.co/h6FJDOKoXL (if you deduct the peer review process, it quickly became clear that here absolutely nothing exciting happens, except the push from the mainstream and politics!) and there is only something
RT @LuMo71: @dianacalibana L'autore di questa perla, che tra l'altro gli ha fatto scattare un punto di H-index. Per dire dell'H-index! htt…
RT @LuMo71: @dianacalibana L'autore di questa perla, che tra l'altro gli ha fatto scattare un punto di H-index. Per dire dell'H-index! htt…
@dianacalibana L'autore di questa perla, che tra l'altro gli ha fatto scattare un punto di H-index. Per dire dell'H-index! https://t.co/8y6VAHeev1 https://t.co/mZU2xCNLjZ
I ricercatori hanno osservato, incrociando i loro dati, ben 12.706 mutazioni in Sars-Cov2 e tuttavia nessuna evidenza significativa che tali mutazioni (varianti) aumentino la trasmissibilità (RO e Rt). P.s.Ulteriore conferma della narrativa criminale Covid
@M_Ciel_M @chrisvalle20 @LudovicBurnon @raoult_didier cette etude fait le point sur les 12000 mutations déjà enregistrées, elle est présentée en nov 2020 . Ce qu'avait pu évoquer raoult en fait parti sans que l'on puisse retenir le terme de Variant qui imp
@PaulKirvan @kraster @DavidSteadson @BallouxFrancois https://t.co/jFPVgKG8CQ Published before delta. Supported by reassuring tweets. Or are you denying the calendar too? https://t.co/lONvwgB8Ny
@Jibrilinho @lexomilee @whattheflo_ Il a muté bien plus de 6-7 fois hein (comme la totalité des virus). Rien qu'en fin d'année 2020, il avait déjà muté plus de 12,000 fois (source pour ceux qui veulent : https://t.co/zpCqE4WldA). https://t.co/THfvkcnujT
@BallouxFrancois @0bj3ctivity @pushkin12 Well you could start with this… https://t.co/f5l0wDI7VS
RT @Daoyu15: @BillyBostickson @babarlelephant @gtuckerkellogg “To avoid the confounding effects of potential recombination and convergent e…
@0bj3ctivity @tomtom_m @BallouxFrancois @nicd_sa Or write and heavily promote articles “proving” variants can’t possible get worse. https://t.co/jFPVgKG8CQ
“recurrent mutations currently in circulation appear to be evolutionary neutral & primarily induced by the human immune system via RNA editing, rather than being signatures of adaptation.” https://t.co/UB03QSV7H7 Undetected while adapting to humans @Ba
@DerekFournier6 @lawgoat @mcmorrod @EricTopol @pkedrosky July 20, more than 12k mutations were established https://t.co/1SlQsA4fRa
RT @TWenseleers: Given that you don't like my high inferred growth advantage of Omicron @BallouxFrancois - what does your RoHo statistic (h…
RT @TWenseleers: (6/6) The method that is used to identify mutations associated with increased transmissibility appears statistically super…
RT @TWenseleers: Given that you don't like my high inferred growth advantage of Omicron @BallouxFrancois - what does your RoHo statistic (h…
RT @TWenseleers: (6/6) The method that is used to identify mutations associated with increased transmissibility appears statistically super…
@ChelseaL82 @notdred @BallouxFrancois You can check the track record of the accuracy of past predictions and then make up your mind. https://t.co/N5DI73zRhM
RT @TWenseleers: Given that you don't like my high inferred growth advantage of Omicron @BallouxFrancois - what does your RoHo statistic (h…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: This is an unusual paper Normally negative findings are difficult to publish, especially in nature comms The finding…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: This is an unusual paper Normally negative findings are difficult to publish, especially in nature comms The finding…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: This is an unusual paper Normally negative findings are difficult to publish, especially in nature comms The finding…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: This is an unusual paper Normally negative findings are difficult to publish, especially in nature comms The finding…
RT @fitterhappierAJ: This is an unusual paper Normally negative findings are difficult to publish, especially in nature comms The finding…
I want to see libertarians dance. https://t.co/YrRW0q0BNO
No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 | Nature Communications https://t.co/EzpxTocYLg
This is an unusual paper Normally negative findings are difficult to publish, especially in nature comms The finding ended up being very disputable and of course it was coauthored by Francois Balloux https://t.co/mLpl0vLruB
RT @jmcrookston: Failed entirely.
RT @jmcrookston: Failed entirely.
Failed entirely.
Y aquí otra serie de datos respecto de las estimaciones para ómicron
RT @DGBassani: Tom has been consistently right. The other one, well...
RT @zin_zah: Tom Wenseleers oli oikeassa mm. Deltan suhteen, joten hänen puheensä Omicronin voimakkaasta kasvusta kannattaa ottaa tosissaan: