You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Personalised Normative Feedback for Preventing Alcohol Misuse in University Students: Solomon Three-Group Randomised Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0044120 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria T. Moreira, Reza Oskrochi, David R. Foxcroft |
| Abstract |
Young people tend to over-estimate peer group drinking levels. Personalised normative feedback (PNF) aims to correct this misperception by providing information about personal drinking levels and patterns compared with norms in similar aged peer groups. PNF is intended to raise motivation for behaviour change and has been highlighted for alcohol misuse prevention by the British Government Behavioural Insight Team. The objective of the trial was to assess the effectiveness of PNF with college students for the prevention of alcohol misuse. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 22% |
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 31 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 62 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,123,820
of 25,158,951 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,810
of 218,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,497
of 176,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,770
of 4,267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,158,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.