You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating natural experiments in ecology: using synthetic controls in assessments of remotely sensed land treatments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/eap.2264 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen E. Fick, Travis W. Nauman, Colby C. Brungard, Michael C. Duniway |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 15 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#13,483,677
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#2,431
of 3,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,461
of 505,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#35
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.