You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41073-020-00101-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clarissa F. D. Carneiro, Victor G. S. Queiroz, Thiago C. Moulin, Carlos A. M. Carvalho, Clarissa B. Haas, Danielle Rayêe, David E. Henshall, Evandro A. De-Souza, Felippe E. Amorim, Flávia Z. Boos, Gerson D. Guercio, Igor R. Costa, Karina L. Hajdu, Lieve van Egmond, Martin Modrák, Pedro B. Tan, Richard J. Abdill, Steven J. Burgess, Sylvia F. S. Guerra, Vanessa T. Bortoluzzi, Olavo B. Amaral |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 14% |
| United States | 12 | 9% |
| France | 8 | 6% |
| Brazil | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| Belgium | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 58 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 82 | 62% |
| Scientists | 31 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 26% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 26% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#344,296
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#12
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,649
of 530,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them