↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Bronchoscopist's perception of the quality of the single-use bronchoscope (Ambu aScope4™) in selected bronchoscopies: a multicenter study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Bronchoscopist's perception of the quality of the single-use bronchoscope (Ambu aScope4™) in selected bronchoscopies: a multicenter study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services
Published in
Respiratory Research, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12931-020-01576-w
Pubmed ID
33267892
Authors

Javier Flandes, Luis Fernando Giraldo-Cadavid, Javier Alfayate, Iker Fernández-Navamuel, Carlos Agusti, Carmen M. Lucena, Antoni Rosell, Felipe Andreo, Carmen Centeno, Carmen Montero, Iria Vidal, Lucía García-Alfonso, Antonio Bango, Miguel Ariza, Rocío Gallego, Marta Orta, Salvador Bello, Elisa Mincholé, Alfons Torrego, Virginia Pajares, Héctor González, Aurelio Luis Wangüemert, Julio Pérez-Izquierdo, Carlos Disdier, Blanca de Vega Sanchez, Rosa Cordovilla, Juan Cascón, Antonio Cruz, J. Javier García-López, Luis Puente, Paola Benedetti, Cristina L. García-Gallo, Gema Díaz Nuevo, Silvia Aguado, Concepción Partida, Prudencio Díaz-Agero, Estefanía Luque Crespo, María Pavón, Francisco Páez, Enrique Cases, Raquel Martínez, Andrés Briones, Cleofe Fernández, Concepción Martín Serrano, Ana Maria Uribe-Hernández, Jose Robles

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Researcher 8 14%
Other 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 19 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 22 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,327,349
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#953
of 2,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,440
of 509,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#27
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.