You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Performance Comparison of Commonly Used Assays to Detect RET Fusions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3208 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Soo-Ryum Yang, Umut Aypar, Ezra Y. Rosen, Douglas A. Mata, Ryma Benayed, Kerry Mullaney, Gowtham Jayakumaran, Yanming Zhang, Denise Frosina, Alexander Drilon, Marc Ladanyi, Achim A. Jungbluth, Natasha Rekhtman, Jaclyn F. Hechtman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 38% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 16% |
| Scientists | 6 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,245,271
of 25,081,419 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#850
of 13,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,387
of 427,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#38
of 336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,081,419 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.