RT @andrew_croxford: It's been suggested that we should integrate viral culture into our testing infrastructure (see paper below). Based…
@Reasonableques3 @LowonZ @spectator Especially since the main test (PCR) alone is unfit to detect infectivity "Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR. ... Those with high cycle threshold are unlikely to ha
RT @DaFeid: (67) New study, great thread 👇 Link to paper: https://t.co/8dVqR0J68a https://t.co/IPrZj5DVec https://t.co/9M615BOZr4
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: PCR creates irrelevant numbers: Viral cultures for #COVID19 infectious potential assessment https://t.co/TWOgC7dtbz Cr…
PCR creates irrelevant numbers: Viral cultures for #COVID19 infectious potential assessment https://t.co/TPLVmsneJm Crappy data result in irrational measures that PARADOXICALLY shift the infections towards #RISKGROUPS! https://t.co/hLRegXhRYO https://t.
RT @AletheiaHappy: @SwissArk @Martin_Mader_63 @BAG_OFSP_UFSP @SwissScience_TF @tagesanzeiger @Blickch @NZZ ...und diese Studie aus Oxford m…
RT @AletheiaHappy: @SwissArk @Martin_Mader_63 @BAG_OFSP_UFSP @SwissScience_TF @tagesanzeiger @Blickch @NZZ ...und diese Studie aus Oxford m…
So if you run an assay to say 40 cycles are you actually detecting live virus or fragments of 'dead' viral RNA? A recent review indicates anything above cycle 32 there is no live virus, or no active infection. https://t.co/GeeOFBw7tf
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: Die Zahlenspiele und Referenzgrenzen sind irrational und massiv schädlich für unsere Gesellschaft
RT @nothankyou_16: RT PCR Goldstandard - Conclusion ♦️"Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified b…
RT @nothankyou_16: RT PCR Goldstandard - Conclusion ♦️"Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified b…
RT @nothankyou_16: RT PCR Goldstandard - Conclusion ♦️"Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified b…
RT PCR Goldstandard - Conclusion ♦️"Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR. ... Those with high cycle threshold are unlikely to have infectious potential." Viral cultures for COVID-19 assessment – Accepted
RT @AletheiaHappy: @SwissArk @Martin_Mader_63 @BAG_OFSP_UFSP @SwissScience_TF @tagesanzeiger @Blickch @NZZ ...und diese Studie aus Oxford m…
RT @AletheiaHappy: @SwissArk @Martin_Mader_63 @BAG_OFSP_UFSP @SwissScience_TF @tagesanzeiger @Blickch @NZZ ...und diese Studie aus Oxford m…
RT @AletheiaHappy: @SwissArk @Martin_Mader_63 @BAG_OFSP_UFSP @SwissScience_TF @tagesanzeiger @Blickch @NZZ ...und diese Studie aus Oxford m…
RT @AletheiaHappy: @SwissArk @Martin_Mader_63 @BAG_OFSP_UFSP @SwissScience_TF @tagesanzeiger @Blickch @NZZ ...und diese Studie aus Oxford m…
RT @AletheiaHappy: @SwissArk @Martin_Mader_63 @BAG_OFSP_UFSP @SwissScience_TF @tagesanzeiger @Blickch @NZZ ...und diese Studie aus Oxford m…
@SwissArk @Martin_Mader_63 @BAG_OFSP_UFSP @SwissScience_TF @tagesanzeiger @Blickch @NZZ ...und diese Studie aus Oxford müsste das Ende für den RT-PCR Goldstandard sein! Für die Übertragung sind vollständige Lebendviren notwendig, nicht die durch PCR identi
Die Zahlenspiele und Referenzgrenzen sind irrational und massiv schädlich für unsere Gesellschaft
RT @Coscienza12: @GeorgeMonbiot @naomirwolf @guardian @OxUniPress @Thomas_Binder Although way before Bullard et al was published a more imp…
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: PCR creates irrelevant numbers: Viral cultures for #COVID19 infectious potential assessment https://t.co/TWOgC7dtbz Cr…
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: PCR creates irrelevant numbers: Viral cultures for #COVID19 infectious potential assessment https://t.co/TWOgC7dtbz Cr…
PCR creates irrelevant numbers: Viral cultures for #COVID19 infectious potential assessment https://t.co/TWOgC7dtbz Crappy data result in irrational measures that PARADOXICALLY shift infections to #RISKGROUPS! Theory https://t.co/carXkjEfda Proof Wuhan ht
RT @RayArmat: The use of PCR tests to report Coronavirus infections is controversial. This paper reviews 29 studies & concludes complete LI…
RT @RayArmat: The use of PCR tests to report Coronavirus infections is controversial. This paper reviews 29 studies & concludes complete LI…
RT @RayArmat: The use of PCR tests to report Coronavirus infections is controversial. This paper reviews 29 studies & concludes complete LI…
RT @RayArmat: The use of PCR tests to report Coronavirus infections is controversial. This paper reviews 29 studies & concludes complete LI…
RT @RayArmat: The use of PCR tests to report Coronavirus infections is controversial. This paper reviews 29 studies & concludes complete LI…
RT @jordi5cat: Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectious potential assessment – a systematic review https://t.co/EP3R4x2dq9
RT @jordi5cat: Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectious potential assessment – a systematic review https://t.co/EP3R4x2dq9
RT @jordi5cat: Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectious potential assessment – a systematic review https://t.co/EP3R4x2dq9
RT @jordi5cat: Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectious potential assessment – a systematic review https://t.co/EP3R4x2dq9
Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectious potential assessment – a systematic review https://t.co/EP3R4x2dq9
@rmrlop @chungalilla666 @polbluespain Sería de risa si no fuera tan triste... Para el ojeador espontáneo de esta conversación:https://t.co/9pPdceIGi8
The Government should not be using the Flawed PCR Tests.They are inaccurate & not fit for purpose.They are using them to fein high levels of Covid Positive Cases hence lying to the public & ordering Lockdown based on these lies @EHRC @PHSOmbudsman
RT @SteveDeaceShow: This is the big question we need to be asking now. What is the cycle threshold of a positive test in your state? That's…
Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectious potential assessment – a systematic review https://t.co/5ezyRRwjgM
OOF
@Kbw83Bendix @SorenSchifter WHO har måttet reagere på studier, der har vist, at PCR-testen er nytteløs i sig selv. Den ikke kan måle sygdom og kan ikke skelne aktiv virus fra døde virus-rester pga tidligere infektioner. Læs: https://t.co/I3AbbbqxBI SSI's
Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectious potential assessment – a systematic review https://t.co/OsSCTosVsc
@litovalencia @JonasHerby Alle der tror, at der er mening i at sende folk i isolation på basis af en positiv PCR-test, har ikke sat sig ordentligt ind i sagerne. 'Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR.'
@jkenney EDUCATE YOURSELVES - IF the TESTING is WRONG, the CASE Numbers are Wrong. https://t.co/rdUQrDmpSc
Educate yourself - What kind of tests are we using? IF the tests are wrong, the CASE numbers are wrong. IF the CASE #s are wrong, POLICY is MISGUIDED. @jkenney @PremierScottMoe @fordnation @jjhorgan LEAD US OUT https://t.co/oSaeqg7VQn
@cjsnowdon How do you know what a 'covid-death' is, when its definition solely relies on a positive result from a test that cannot measure disease? 'RT-qPCR cannot measure the quantity of live virus present in a person’s excreta.' https://t.co/I3AbbbqxBI
@litovalencia @JonasHerby Videnskaben har dumpet test-regimet. Jeg refererer kun. 'PCR cannot distinguish between the shedding of live virus or of viral fragments with no infectious potential, and it cannot measure the quantity of live virus present in a
@70s_70sgirl @cjsnowdon @Tangrantum @FatEmperor What is the definition of a 'covid-death'? Hopefully not a positive PCR-test: '[PCR] cannot distinguish between live virus and viral fragments with no infectious potential, and it cannot measure the quantity
@JonasHerby Det gabende hul i corona-kampen: Hvad er smitte? Der er ingen der ved, om folk med en positiv PCR-test kan smitte andre. Alligevel sendes de folk i isolation 🙄 'Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identifie
RT @dockaurG: Peer-reviewed: “Viral cultures for Covid-19 infectious potential assessment—systematic review” “Complete live viruses are ne…
@SarahC10au @TennysSandgren With such onerous policies, you have my sympathy. Yet Melb should welcome Tennys and his antibodies! Clarity that a positive PCR test (esp. w/no symptoms) doesn’t always = infectiousness is key to calming the nerves: https://t.c
RT @ShannonJoyRadio: Dear @DrMikeMendoza & @CountyExecBello Your tests are fraudulent. There is no #COVID19 spike. You will eventually be…
RT @ShannonJoyRadio: Dear @DrMikeMendoza & @CountyExecBello Your tests are fraudulent. There is no #COVID19 spike. You will eventually be…
RT @gerdosi: "Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR. ... Those with high cycle threshol…
RT @ShannonJoyRadio: Dear @DrMikeMendoza & @CountyExecBello Your tests are fraudulent. There is no #COVID19 spike. You will eventually be…
OMG FINALLY SOMEONE ELSE GETS IT ..IVE BEEN SAYING THIS..BUT YOU KNOW IM CRAZY..RIGHT🤦🤦..THE TRUTH ALWAYS COMES OUT PERIOD.. EVERYTIME.. #GODWINSALWAYS
RT @ShannonJoyRadio: Dear @DrMikeMendoza & @CountyExecBello Your tests are fraudulent. There is no #COVID19 spike. You will eventually be…
RT @ShannonJoyRadio: Dear @DrMikeMendoza & @CountyExecBello Your tests are fraudulent. There is no #COVID19 spike. You will eventually be…
RT @ShannonJoyRadio: Dear @DrMikeMendoza & @CountyExecBello Your tests are fraudulent. There is no #COVID19 spike. You will eventually be…
RT @ShannonJoyRadio: Dear @DrMikeMendoza & @CountyExecBello Your tests are fraudulent. There is no #COVID19 spike. You will eventually be…
RT @ShannonJoyRadio: Dear @DrMikeMendoza & @CountyExecBello Your tests are fraudulent. There is no #COVID19 spike. You will eventually be…
RT @ShannonJoyRadio: Dear @DrMikeMendoza & @CountyExecBello Your tests are fraudulent. There is no #COVID19 spike. You will eventually be…
Dear @DrMikeMendoza & @CountyExecBello Your tests are fraudulent. There is no #COVID19 spike. You will eventually be exposed. End #Lockdown in Monroe County NOW. https://t.co/Qjfubjl4dI @ToddHallidy @evandawson @news10nbc @News_8 @WXXINews @DandC @ra
RT @andrewbostom: A systematic review published 12/3/20 by the Oxford U Ctr for Evidence-Based Med has confirmed that C19 rtPCR testing pat…
@mojo0000000000n @DomperiP3 @Mami38796588 論文のシステマティックレビューによればCt値30以上は感染力がないんだが、あなたの言っている論文は、そのレビューに弾かれるほどマイナーな論文なんですか? https://t.co/S44qEdjsre
RT @DocDM4: "Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR.” “Twelve studies reported that Ct…
RT @DocDM4: "Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR.” “Twelve studies reported that Ct…
@DrRomainBrunel De secreción bronquial, parece consistente la evidencia para evaluar virulencia por medio de ensayos invitro de muestras con Ct tanto bajos como altos. Un Ct alto en un paciente crítico muestra virus inactivo y clínica de inflamación. https
RT @DocDM4: "Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR.” “Twelve studies reported that Ct…
RT @DocDM4: "Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR.” “Twelve studies reported that Ct…
RT @DocDM4: "Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR.” “Twelve studies reported that Ct…
RT @DocDM4: "Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR.” “Twelve studies reported that Ct…
RT @DocDM4: "Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR.” “Twelve studies reported that Ct…
@mojo0000000000n 平均が30なら高すぎでしょう。上限が30ならともかく。分離培養できるケースというのは感染力があるという意味なんですかね。Ct値35以上で感染力がありと主張している論文や研究者が存在するということですか? https://t.co/ZPGs5CIvNd
RT @FLMIRONES: #MIRONEWS Me quedé corto, las rtPCR como se están usando dan un 97% de error. Le están arruinando a usted la vida en base a…
@Gurdur Even better scientific consider @carlheneghan report. You’re out of your depth Tim since you have no experience running RTPCR or in clinical diagnostics. Don’t need armchair quarterbacks. https://t.co/tlP0tmDiH8
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: @Pollemann1 @DrPuerner WHY are goverments ignoring the fallacies arising from #coronavirus PCR & random testing w/o #c…
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: @Pollemann1 @DrPuerner WHY are goverments ignoring the fallacies arising from #coronavirus PCR & random testing w/o #c…
RT @Thomas_Wilckens: @pfanneaufkopf @marcus_riehl @KlaarGlass @DrPuerner WHY are goverments ignoring the fallacies arising from #coronaviru…
RT @RayArmat: The use of PCR tests to report Coronavirus infections is controversial. This paper reviews 29 studies & concludes complete LI…
RT @ivaningrad: @FLMIRONES @DesdelAtlantico Fuente del estudio del CEBM de Oxford: https://t.co/W2qoCd85wF Y ejemplo de test hecho en Espa…
RT @ivaningrad: @BUSEROLOCO @Oespinar1 @informativost5 Aquí tienes uno de tantos PCR usados criminalmente para destrozar vidas: https://t.c…
RT @ivaningrad: @FLMIRONES @DesdelAtlantico Fuente del estudio del CEBM de Oxford: https://t.co/W2qoCd85wF Y ejemplo de test hecho en Espa…
@triplesilk @HigherEdActuary @ActuaryByDay @COVID19actuary @longevitymatt @FT wonderful you are in favour of fact checking. https://t.co/fzGSw7AVF7
RT @eVDBGQP1vRkvakv: 30以上は感染性がない。35以上はほとんどが偽陽性なのは、もうとっくに確定している。40か45でやっている日本人は完全に騙されている。国家としてⅭt値を下げない限り検査を受けてはいけない。巨人の坂本が37.78、大城が34・95、どちら…
RT @RayArmat: The use of PCR tests to report Coronavirus infections is controversial. This paper reviews 29 studies & concludes complete LI…
@pfanneaufkopf @marcus_riehl @KlaarGlass @DrPuerner WHY are goverments ignoring the fallacies arising from #coronavirus PCR & random testing w/o #covid19 symptoms? https://t.co/sFEonnS4KU Viral shedding may continue 92 days vs infectious stage 5-10d ?
@Pollemann1 @DrPuerner WHY are goverments ignoring the fallacies arising from #coronavirus PCR & random testing w/o #covid19 symptoms? https://t.co/sFEonnS4KU Viral shedding may continue 92 days vs infectious stage 5-10d ? READ https://t.co/BckxvjDNtG
Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectious potential assessment – a systematic review | Clinical Infectious Diseases | Oxford Academic https://t.co/wUuJIGAawx
RT @RayArmat: The use of PCR tests to report Coronavirus infections is controversial. This paper reviews 29 studies & concludes complete LI…
RT @RayArmat: The use of PCR tests to report Coronavirus infections is controversial. This paper reviews 29 studies & concludes complete LI…
@ErikJrg84788981 @FlemmingSvenss1 PCR tester faktisk for sars-cov2. Problemet er, at PCR ikke kan se forskel på, om det er smitsom virus, eller om det er døde virus-rester fra tidligere infektion. Den kan heller ikke se virus-mængden, dvs. den kan ikke se,