↓ Skip to main content

Estimating Distribution of Hidden Objects with Drones: From Tennis Balls to Manatees

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimating Distribution of Hidden Objects with Drones: From Tennis Balls to Manatees
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0038882
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julien Martin, Holly H. Edwards, Matthew A. Burgess, H. Franklin Percival, Daniel E. Fagan, Beth E. Gardner, Joel G. Ortega-Ortiz, Peter G. Ifju, Brandon S. Evers, Thomas J. Rambo

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), or drones, have been used widely in military applications, but more recently civilian applications have emerged (e.g., wildlife population monitoring, traffic monitoring, law enforcement, oil and gas pipeline threat detection). UAV can have several advantages over manned aircraft for wildlife surveys, including reduced ecological footprint, increased safety, and the ability to collect high-resolution geo-referenced imagery that can document the presence of species without the use of a human observer. We illustrate how geo-referenced data collected with UAV technology in combination with recently developed statistical models can improve our ability to estimate the distribution of organisms. To demonstrate the efficacy of this methodology, we conducted an experiment in which tennis balls were used as surrogates of organisms to be surveyed. We used a UAV to collect images of an experimental field with a known number of tennis balls, each of which had a certain probability of being hidden. We then applied spatially explicit occupancy models to estimate the number of balls and created precise distribution maps. We conducted three consecutive surveys over the experimental field and estimated the total number of balls to be 328 (95%CI: 312, 348). The true number was 329 balls, but simple counts based on the UAV pictures would have led to a total maximum count of 284. The distribution of the balls in the field followed a simulated environmental gradient. We also were able to accurately estimate the relationship between the gradient and the distribution of balls. Our experiment demonstrates how this technology can be used to create precise distribution maps in which discrete regions of the study area are assigned a probability of presence of an object. Finally, we discuss the applicability and relevance of this experimental study to the case study of Florida manatee distribution at power plants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 286 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 68 22%
Student > Master 68 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 12%
Other 24 8%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 43 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 137 45%
Environmental Science 76 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 50 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,645,349
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#68,750
of 194,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,390
of 164,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,129
of 3,956 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,956 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.