↓ Skip to main content

Prospective validation of the “rhino conjunctivitis allergy-control-SCORE©” (RC-ACS©)

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prospective validation of the “rhino conjunctivitis allergy-control-SCORE©” (RC-ACS©)
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/2045-7022-2-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dietrich Häfner, Kristian Reich, Ina Zschocke, Annett Lotzin, Hanns Meyer, Jens Kettner, Annemie Narkus

Abstract

Recently we reported the validation of the "Allergy-Control-SCORE© (ACS)" which assesses symptom severity as well as medication use on three dimensions lung, nose and eyes. The aim of this study was to test the validity of the score for eyes and nose.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 3 27%
Other 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 55%
Psychology 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2012.
All research outputs
#1,793,407
of 12,445,334 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#135
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,640
of 126,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,445,334 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.