You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Protocol for Cortical Type Analysis of the Human Neocortex Applied on Histological Samples, the Atlas of Von Economo and Koskinas, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2020.576015 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Miguel Ángel García-Cabezas, Julia Liao Hacker, Basilis Zikopoulos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 29% |
Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
Turkey | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Japan | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 11 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 11 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 16 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,569,973
of 23,856,830 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#142
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,275
of 513,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,856,830 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.