↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between the physical environment and different domains of physical activity in European adults: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationship between the physical environment and different domains of physical activity in European adults: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-807
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veerle Van Holle, Benedicte Deforche, Jelle Van Cauwenberg, Liesbet Goubert, Lea Maes, Nico Van de Weghe, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij

Abstract

In the past decade, various reviews described the relationship between the physical environment and different physical activity (PA) domains. Yet, the majority of the current review evidence relies on North American/Australian studies, while only a small proportion of findings refer to European studies. Given some clear environmental differences across continents, this raises questions about the applicability of those results in European settings. This systematic review aimed at summarizing Europe-specific evidence on the relationship between the physical environment and different PA domains in adults.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
Belgium 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 216 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 26%
Student > Master 55 24%
Researcher 40 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 14 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 18%
Social Sciences 39 17%
Sports and Recreations 31 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Engineering 10 4%
Other 53 23%
Unknown 40 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,933,441
of 15,647,079 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,385
of 10,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,095
of 135,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,647,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them